AJ or Povetkin, who do YOU want to win?

Right. So all his wins was because he had physical advantage and it had nothing to do with his boxing skills? You are mad. Hate on Joshua all you want but he is a good boxer.

 

Joshua is good but that man in your profile pic was a BUM. Vitali Klitschko's beat down of him was one of the most BRUTAL, violent beatdowns I've ever seen.

 

Walk in any Pub in Britain and I guarantee you 99% of the White brits will be supporting Joshua, so wtf you talking about.

 

99% of Brits will be roaring for Bellew you filthy rodent.

 

Well, I dont think that joshua is that good, we dont agree, no problem.

 

Wtf are you talking about. I know there are white Brits who back Joshua. I'm talking about Brits who are backing Povetkin. You probably one of the people I'm talking about bet you physically cry when Joshua beats your boy tonight.

 

Vitali klitschko? Who the guy that Lennox beat and busted his eye nearly off his face. Fook out of here.

 

I'm hoping Povertkin wins, I just cannot warm to Joshua at all.

 

Booted lol. Thats what you get for bad mouthing Danny lmao

 

I want Povetkin to win because I am a Russophile.


Stay humble, brothers!

 

and dont forget to drink your PEDs, comrad.

 

AJ so Wilder can Windmill him to death and then show off his elite dance moves

 

BTW
I’m in the USA and in the south
Bomb Squad

 

No, they can't be. Since individuals don't decide the outcomes of football matches. Entire teams do! Not sure what you're trying to imply with the Messi analogy, since he isn't even in his late 30's yet.

Tennis is a better / more accurate analogy, since it's an individual sport. But only Roger Federer has shown unprecedented longevity and quality in his late 30's. Nobody else has. But this doesn't come as a surprise, since Federer is commonly accepted to be the greatest tennis player ever.

It is scientifically accepted that athletes in their late 30's decline in terms of athletic qualities compared to their teen years, early 20's, late 20's and early 30's. And even Olympics backs this idea up too!

Very rarely, if EVER do we see elite level success by athletes during their late 30's.

If Povetkin beats Joshua, then it becomes an indisputable fact that he would have had a better career than Mike Tyson. And even if he loses, an argument can be made that he still had a better career than Mike Tyson, although it'd be a lot closer.

We can't ignore the fact that Mike Tyson has had losses, particularly KO losses to multiple, less than stellar opposition. And he simply didn't sustain longevity and consistency at the top for long enough.

Whereas Povetkin would retire with 0 losses to non-elite opponents. And would have had a much more consistent career at the top level.

I usually value consistency more than anything else in sports. You could argue that Messi is better than Maradona because of CONSISTENCY!

 

Sure he is!