YES!!! TURPIN!!! That was the answer I was hoping for. I would have to go with him as well. I think if he had lowered his sights and only concentrated on defending his British middleweight title he would have exceeded Harvey's number of defences. I also think Turpin would have made mincemeat of Eubank. His strength in the clinches would have been too much for Eubank. It's such a shame that personal issues affected Turpin's career. If he had been fully focussed I think he would have regained the world middleweight title without too much fuss when he fought Bobo Olson.
Regarding Turpin, excellent fighter with a great win but I'm afraid one swallow does not make a summer.
great choice, but wrong weight really... Harvey was a L-HW, but more importantly Len Harvey IS Britain's Overall Greatest Ever Fighter... the Benn, Watson, Eubank era is going to win it here, followed by Turpin, but the real accolade goes to Jock McAvoy & Bert Gilroy.
True but no other British middleweight can boast a win that comes close to his victory over Robinson and he was giving a good account of himself in the rematch.
One win obviously stands out and his prime was short, but Humez and Cockell (at LHW admittedly) are not to be sniffed at. He managed to win British European and Empire titles, as well as the British version of the World title. His career wasn't just about one night. As with a lot of these questions, if you count Fitzsimmons as British he is the greatest ever. If not, I'd go with Turpin. Minter deserves a mention as he was one of the few to be undisputed champ, and he beat plenty of good guys throughout his career. His record is brought down a bit by all those cut-eye losses. Downes is often overlooked these days, but he has more quality wins than most high-profile British middleweights. It obviously wasn't his best weight, but Ted Kid Lewis had a decent run at middleweight. He was very competitive in the 5 fight series with O'Dowd, and there are conflicting reports of his fight with Gibbons. He also won British, Empire and European titles. Benn, Eubank and Watson fought a round-robin with each other, but otherwise their records are underwhelming at 160. Benn has the big win over Barkley, but he was far from invincible. Watson and Eubank beat Benn, but at no point were any of them considered the best in the division, and Watson's loss to McCallum puts their status at the time into perspective. Benn and Eubank both had longer title runs and achieved more at 168.
Herol Graham was the best. I thought be beat McCallum and Kalambay (rematch). He schooled KALULE (who gave Leonard hell). Robinson was far past his best (and far past his best weight) against Turpin.
Robinson wasn't far past his best at all when he fought Turpin, he'd only lost one fight out of 135 up till then!