Will Wilder become a bigger name than AJ if he beats Fury?

Aj is a paper titlist masquerading as champion with Tyson Fury's belts. The importance of AJ's belt will be rendered redundant after the December 1, because the rightful owner of those belts would have been knocked out.

 

Wow. So much salt in there i need a drink. Your manufactured fighter thing could of held water if he hadnt of beaten a whose who of the top 20 after 20 fights, well hes beaten a whose who of the top 10 too. I could say who hasnt Joshua faced, youd say Wilder, id say who hasnt Wilder faced and the answer is anybody. So if that fight doesnt happen im guna blame it on the guy who hasnt seemed to of shown the guts to fight any of the top guys and not the one whose fought all of them and is only missing the guys who dont seem to want to fight the best.

 

You certainly havnt made your 1st post a good one. Atleast i know where people like Stephanie Rising is coming from as she is a long standing poster who has shared alot of her views on Joshua and why she doesnt like him. This is your 1st post and your calling Joshua a paper champion, carrying somebody elses belts, you could of found the time to elaborate so we can figure out if you are a genius with great Boxing ideas or if your just another fanboy who talks utter **** but isnt prepared to back that up with any facts or thought out opinion. Cuz right now you just sound like another dumb LDBC goon who really doesnt have a clue.

 

You can't dispute anything that I said, that's why you're throwing ad hominem attacks at me. Belts don't make fighters, fighters make the belt.

Fury dethroned the rightful and universally recognized heavyweight champion of the world. Fact!

Fury never lost his belts in the ring. Fact!

Eddie and Joshua did something equivalent of buying a stolen property on Craigslist.....and that is buying Fury's stolen belts by way of one of the worst heavyweight titlist in history in Charles "I walk this earth like a god" Martin.

After that, AJ and Eddie in association with rest of corrupt alphabet organization conspired to crown Joshua champion by bringing a washed up Vladimir Klitschko who has fought for 2 years since losing a lopsided decision to Fury out of retirement for the rest Fury's belts.

You Joshua fanboys think that we're stupid. Like I said before, belts don't make champions, champions make belts. The rightful owner of every single one of Joshua's fake belts is fighting Wilder on Dec 1.

 

Thank you for your reply, We now know what type of idiot we are dealing with.

 

The truth always prevails. Thanks for throwing the white flag.

 

AJ has few in America that know him and he lives in the UK
Wilder is the first American HW champ in over a decade and can stroll through the airport without as much as a second glance.
Furry might not be the same fighter he was was 3 years ago but a FK load more casuals know his name in America than they do AJ

Wilder needs to get past Furry and accept a reasonable split and then KTFO of AJ

 

LMAO no, there's still tons of tickets left and no undercard announced.

This PPV will flop. Should have been a regular BT Sports fight in the UK.

 

Just remind me of how many defences the 'rightful' champion made? The amount of times he pulled out of a fight?

Sounds like a real champion lol

Fighters do make the belt and real champions defend the their titles.

The whole never lost the belts in the ring is a nonsense.

If Anthony Joshua took a break for 2 years you think we gonna in two years time claim his still the champion as he never lost the belts in the ring?

It's laughable.

It's the equilivant of calling Tony Bellew the rightful WBC CW champion as he never lost in the ring so Usyk isn't the unified champion. Its nonsensical.

Actually we can go further back. David Haye was the lineal CW champion holding 3 titles and the ring title. Never lost them in the ring so up until his retirement was still the champ.

 

The world titles now belong to AJ if you like it or not and he has earned them. Tyson Fury gave up the right to call himself IBF champion when he refused to fight his mandatory challenger. Fury then pulled out the rematch against Wlad due to a fake injury as they weren't selling enough tickets. Fury then lost WBA, WBO titles through failling drug test on two seprate occasions (one for PED and the other recreational). Fury was eventually stripped of Ring Magazine belt due to inactivity and during that time he announced his retirement on a couple different occasions.

 

One of the most ridiculous thread titles I've read in quite a while.

The answer to the question is.. NO

It's not even debatable.

 

Even Dan Rafael laughed and dismissed the idea of a 60-40 split in favour for Wilder and stated a 60 -40 split for AJ if Hearn was feeling generous.

This content is protected

 

Wilder already is a bigger name than Joshua outside of the UK, so he was always entitled to 50/50. Beating Fury in the wouldn't really change anything, since besides hardcore boxing fans a lot of people in America hardly know who Fury or Joshua is.

 

everyone loves a winner that bandwagon will be full

 

Fury never defended his belts once he wasnt there long enough for me to still see him how you do. 1 time we can call it luck, its defending your belts against all comers that makes you a real champion. Fury never lost his belts in the ring but he lost them and more importantly Anthony Joshua won them IN THE RING. They are his titles and its up to Fury to win them back. Or Wilder or who ever.