UPDATED P4P LIST

At this point I think people just put Spence on their list because everyone else is doing it. He has 1 good win. Against a guy who also only has 1 good win. How is that p4p worthy?

 

Everybody hating that Canelo is the p4p king!!! Lol

 

If Canelo isn’t ****, neither is GGG.

 

1.Canelo
2.Usyk
3.Loma
4.Joshua
5.Crawford

 

1. Lomachenko
2. Crawford
3. Usyk
4. Rungvisai
5. GGG
6. Inoue
7. Spence
8. Mikey Garcia
9. Joshua
10. Leo Santa Cruz

No place in my top 10 for a ginger diva and tainted beef addict who role plays as DLH's gimp.

 

So you made a PFP list just to spite Canelo. LOL

 

1. Lomachenko
2. Inoue
3. Crawford
4. Usyk
5. GGG/Canelo
6. Rungvisai
7. Joshua
8. Mikey Garcia/Spence
9. Isaac Dogboe
10.Leo Santa Cruz/Carl Frampton
Fury gets added when he beats Wilder.

 

+ PED's

 

Change Canelo with Golovkin and I’ll like the comment

 

Most people neglect resume on this forum and it's just not right...

How can people put Crawford top when he hasn't fought anybody? Would people not agree that what you see when you watch a fighter is equal to their resume? Yes. Therefore, how can people justify not having AJ in their lists and then include Crawford at Number 1 (I have no problem having him in the top 5 somewhere, just not top of the pile) and people like Mikey Garcia, Spence up there who haven't fought a fly. It's ridiculous.

I do appreciate titles but it only goes so far when they've fought nobodies to claim those titles..

Mikey fought nobodies. Spence fought a man with one eye (Brook) and a smaller mirror image of himself (Peterson). And you're telling me that Joshua hasn't looked as good against bums as these guys have. Brawn should be treated the same as Brain. As long as you win, you win. You either look impressive or you don't. Has Spence? Yes. Has Mikey? Yes. Has Joshua? ABSOLUTELY YES!!! But we'll just forget about Joshua because we think an olympic gold medallist is average at best....

If Crawford's 'skill rating' was rated out of 10, and we gave it a 10..and his resume was given a rating of 7, then that gives him a score of 17/20. If Joshua's 'skill rating' was rated out of 10, and we gave it a 7...and his resume was given a rating of 10, then that gives him a score of 17/20. And you can't argue too much with what I've just said, can you? You might alter those ratings within a margin of 1 either way, but I'm pretty much correct.

Now let's look at Spence and Garcia shall we? If Spence's 'skill rating' was rated out of 10 and we gave it a 8...and his resume was given a rating of 6, then that gives him a score of 14/20. If Garcia's 'skill rating' was rated out of 10, and we gave it a 9...and his resume was given a rating of 6, then that gives him a score of 15/20. Again, I'm very close to how other people would rate that, am I not?

Callum Smith has done more than the two of them when it comes to resume. One win over Groves proves that. And you can't say he is significantly lesser skilled than Mikey and Spence. So why is Spence in that list while Smith is not? Neither should be in the list really, but Smith deserves to be in the list more than Spence does.

That means we get a conclusion that a lot of the people on this forum need to grasp. Resume is equal to 'skill'. It makes no sense to have people like Spence in these lists, while excluding people like Joshua's, who's resume more than makes up for the lack of 'skill' as some people claim. Joshua must be in that top 10. Otherwise your list is complete rubbish. Rant over.

 

It's a tricky one regarding GGG. As far as I'm concerned he won both fights vs Canelo. I assume most think he will lose a rubber match due to his age and Canelo improving / staying the same.

Anyway here is my list:

1. Lomachenko (Without question)
2. Crawford
3. Usyk
4. GGG
5. Canelo
6. Inoue
7. Rungvisia
8. Garcia
9. Spence Jnr
10. Linares (great display against Loma, no shame in defeat).

If Linares had to come out I would put in Leo Santa Cruz. Joshua will enter if he beats Wilder and Fury. If he defeats Usyk in style he will be in my top 5.