vs Floyd vs GGG-1 vs GGG-2 vs Lara vs Trout vs Cotto My scores were: 108-120 vs Floyd 112-116 vs GGG (first fight) 115-113 vs GGG in the rematch 113-115 vs Lara 115-112 vs Trout 115-113 vs Cotto
110-118 Mayweather 112-116 GGG 1&2 115-113 Lara 114-113 Trout 116-112 Cotto Canelo is an excellent boxer. I'm a fan of him but objectively his record could be at 49-2-3 and not 51-1-2.
Honestly dont remember my scorecards but I had Mayweather easy Canelo beating Lara close Canelo beating Cotto close Golovkin beating Canelo clearly in fight 1 Canelo beating G close in fight 2 Havent seen the Trout fight.
Floyd (shut out for IV Man) Trout (Draw) Lara (Won By Robbery) Cotto (Canelo Win) Golovkin I (Won By Robbery) Golovkin II (Won By Robbery)
True. But then again, almost every A side fighters record could be objectively worse. If Mayweather was a foreign fighter fighting abroad he could have very well have lost the castillo and maidana fights. Cotto could have lost the Clottey fight. Pac could have lost JMM 2 and 3 Oscar could have lost the tito and sturm fights Ect ect ect. Its pretty much the status quo in boxing that A siders will get the benefit of the doubt in close fights.
I prefer Canelo to Mayweather. But even if I have Castillo winner and I'm also tempted to do it with Maidana, these two fights are tighter than GGG vs. Canelo I for example.
You're worse than C.J. Ross or Adalaide Byrd lol. These are joke scores. I don't know what's worse, 12-0 Mayweather or 10-2 GGG in the first Canelo fight. Horrible scores lmao. Oddly enough these scores are reasonable. You must just suffer from an extreme Mayweather and GGG bias.
The only fight Canelo lost was to Mayweather. In Trout, Lara, GGG, and GGG 2 Canelo did well enough to win but each of them are debatable. (though Trout not really in large part due to the knockdown) Canelo vs Cotto is not really debatable. Canelo clearly beat Cotto, that's really just a debate as to how many rounds Cotto won. Did Cotto win 1 round, did he win 2 rounds, did he win 3 rounds or maybe 4 rounds but that's really stretching it. No one would reasonably dare argue Cotto won or even did enough to deserve close to a draw.
Don't tend to sit down n score fights but I remember I had: vs Floyd = Floyd very wide vs GGG-1 = Very close GGG win vs GGG-2 = Very close Canelo Win vs Lara = Lara close vs Trout = didn't watch full fight vs Cotto = Didn't watch full fight
116-111 vs Trout (could see it 115-112 too) 110-118 vs Floyd (a draw from a judge in this fight proved how corrupt boxing can be) 115-113 vs Lara (could see it 114-114 or even 113-115 too) 116-112 vs Cotto (could see it closer but no doubt Canelo won) 112-116 vs Golovkin-1 (could see it closer but no doubt Golovkin won) 113-115 vs Golovkin-2 (could see it a draw, CAN'T see Canelo win though...)
