Maybe GGG is bored of the ginger diva and all the rubbish that comes with fighting him - like his judge pals, his obvious juicing, his depraved promotor etc. Maybe GGG wants an honest fight with an honest fighter.
Look, I thought Golovkin won both fights...............but Canelo has proven his mettle as far as durability and being able to stand up to Golovkin's shots though...........Neither of them have the ability to dispatch the other.
We only saying Golovkin would win the trilogy fight by a brutal knockout because Canelo is the evil and GGG is the good guy in boxing 90% that the fight would go to distance and would be close again GGG won both fights but good chance that Canelo is winning at least 6 rounds against a 37 year old Golovkin.
We only saying Golovkin would win the trilogy fight by a brutal knockout because Canelo is the evil and GGG is the good guy in boxing 90% that the fight would go to distance and would be close again GGG won both fights but good chance that Canelo is winning at least 6 rounds against a 37 year old Golovkin.
I like this becoming known as the Decline Trilogy. It suits these fights. We've seen a decline in Golovkins abilities, a decline in respect for Canelo and a decline of moral standards in the sport.
I think GGG like canelo was damaged in the fight. Those sick shots to the body took something out of GGG he may be healing and testing his body before he commits. Yes everybody wants money but losing 2 decisions that could have gone either way is different than being laid out or truly dominated.
And decline in Golovkins, as well as many others’, belief in the game. He ditched his boxing style to show everyone he can beat ginger in his own game, only to get **** for everything Canelo did worse in the first fight yet received praise.
Stop pushing the could of gone either way narrative. Even if YOU think Canelo might have done enough - which I struggle to believe anyone objective could do and this is reflected in public opinion - there was simply no way THE JUDGES were ever going to have scored it for Golovkin. That it could of gone either way is a total myth. It was only ever going one way if it was remotely competitive and it was competitive.
It was obvious corruption IMHO. That 118-110 card in fight 1 was so atrocious that even ODLH had to go on record and condemn it.
Exactly. You can’t have 85-90% of the people having the same result, yet 2 out of 3 judges conveniently falling into the remaining 10-15%, along with GBP and Canelo’s family members. And getting a ridiculous 10-2 card on top of that.
And yet we have these Canelo fans/Golovkin haters pretend that 'it could of gone either way' when they know full well it couldn't