He would have no chance against Fury. Fury would take him into boxing school with shutout. AJ would be big time favorite. It is possible that Klit could outpoint him if fight was in Germany, but in any other scenario Klit loses. Wilder he would probably beat by step - weak jab - two steps back,tactic. It would be a horrible fight to watch.
Fury beat a younger Wlad, so he has the best win. Second best win, probably Pov although he was way past best. I'd say that win is on par with Ortiz roughly. OR you can forgo the 'official' resume and say Fury has Wilder's scalp too, which would make his resume the best IMO. AJ's is the deeper of the 3, so it depends how you rate resumes really. In my book, Fury has the best 2 wins and that's enough to put him top of the pile, but I wouldn't argue about AJ having the best too fiercely
That younger Wlad was 3 month to 40 and Pov 39. I think younger guys, who are in their 20s dont think that age matters that much, but when you're 40 you're 40...
He couldn't walk through a one armed Kevin Johnson , and during his terrible era , Johnson was ranked in the top 10.. lol wtf??!! We all saw what a green novice AJ done to Johnson. Joshua ran him through so badly , he made him announce his retirement immediately afterwards.
He would likely beat AJ and Wilder, either by boxing or brawling (though the hands down defence might be risky against Wilder). How could he beat 2Fast2Furious though? Fury was faster than Wlad, who was pretty fast at that size and Fury would be way faster than Vitali. Wlad is a one puncher and always has a chance, but Vitali would need to accumulate on Fury to KO and wouldn't get the chance. He'd be outpointed I'm sure and his face would look twice as bad as it did versus Kevin Johnson by the end.
What is with the vit klit obsession on this forum? He did nothing to position himself as this legendary monster everyone is describing. He's an alphabet champion who had the tools but he never beat anyone of note and somehow hes viewed as unbeatable head to head
