Could Jack Dempsey take out Fury same as he did to Willard

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Oakland Billy Smith, Apr 7, 2019.

  1. Oakland Billy Smith

    Oakland Billy Smith Active Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2018
    Messages:
    1,102
    Likes Received:
    1,108
    If anything he would probably have even less respect for Fury's power than he did for Willards
     
  2. emallini

    emallini Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Messages:
    11,274
    Likes Received:
    2,538
    Fury is much much much much harder to hit
     
  3. The Undefeated Lachbuster

    The Undefeated Lachbuster On the Italian agenda Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2018
    Messages:
    4,900
    Likes Received:
    7,574
    Willard hit harder and had the better chin, but Fury is more elusive

    I think it's a matter of WHEN Dempsey catches him, rather than what happens after
     
    The Malibu Mauler likes this.
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    61,769
    Likes Received:
    46,461
    Fury clowns him senseless. Comparing Willard to Fury is rife with inconsistencies. Willard was a leaden footed old man with very limited skill set. Fury is a light footed dancer, a deft and remarkable athlete who uses position and angles. And he is FAST.
     
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2019
    Ken Ashcroft likes this.
  5. Ken Ashcroft

    Ken Ashcroft Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2008
    Messages:
    4,912
    Likes Received:
    5,195
    To be fair, Fury was not only simply more elusive than Willard but also bigger, a better and more accurate boxer, better and faster footwork, could switch to southpaw and probably a far better boxing IQ.

    Dempsey may well still take him out if he managed to catch him flush at some point but definitely not in the same way as he took out Willard.
     
    mcvey likes this.