Who's the best fundamental boxer?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by The Malibu Mauler, Apr 15, 2019.



  1. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,052
    10,840
    Oct 12, 2013
    JCC, McCallum, Joe Louis, Freddie Steele, Carlos Monzon, Alexis Arguello, Donald Curry, Holyfield, Trinidad, B-hop amongst many well schooled fundamentalist styles
     
    The Malibu Mauler likes this.
  2. The Malibu Mauler

    The Malibu Mauler Lakers in 5 Full Member

    361
    628
    Oct 2, 2018
    Yes, that's exactly what I was asking for
     
  3. Ken Ashcroft

    Ken Ashcroft Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,645
    4,800
    Dec 23, 2008
    When you think about, Larry Holmes technique and fighting style was just about as ‘basic’ as it’s gets. Controlling the pattern of a fight with a fast accurate jab, backed up with a heavy right cross and a occasional surprising right uppercut. Wasn’t particularly fond of inside body work or left hooking off the jab. Had strong legs and though not as fast or as nimble as Ali on his feet, was able to move quick enough out of range when needed.

    So in summary, you could so that Larry’s style was pretty basic and straightforward but he just did it so much better than his contemporaries that he was able to achieve recognition as one of the finest heavyweight ever.
     
    Big Ukrainian likes this.
  4. thanosone

    thanosone Love Your Brother Man Full Member

    6,499
    2,410
    Sep 23, 2007
    When I think of the perfect boxer I think Of The Great Mexican Legend Marvin Hagler.
     
  5. ChrisJS

    ChrisJS Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,081
    6,667
    Sep 11, 2018
    Eder Jofre
    Jose Napoles
    Harold Johnson
    Juan Manuel Marquez
    Ricardo Lopez
    Alexis Arguello
    Carlos Ortiz
    George Benton
    Gilberto Roman

    Those are the ones that come to mind that seem to do most things technically sound in terms of pure technique and skill. Ortiz may look a little out of place because he wasn’t as explosive as the others but he was complete and made very few technical or tactical mistakes.
     
  6. SheenLantern

    SheenLantern Active Member Full Member

    518
    890
    Jan 13, 2016
    I'm gonna say Rigo. And that's probably what did him in against Loma, that he was unable to comprehend his unorthadox style.
     
  7. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,771
    Aug 26, 2011
    Jofre
    Harold
    Napoles
    Benny Leonard
    Lopez
     
  8. Jayme Chavez

    Jayme Chavez Member Full Member

    174
    196
    Nov 15, 2018
  9. Tomato(e) Can

    Tomato(e) Can Emmanuel Dapidran Pacquiao. banned Full Member

    6,300
    5,629
    Feb 19, 2018
  10. Russell

    Russell VIP Member Full Member

    41,429
    10,559
    Apr 1, 2007
    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  11. SignTheContract

    SignTheContract New Member Full Member

    80
    19
    Jan 23, 2009
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,276
    38,833
    Mar 21, 2007
    Juan Manuel Marquez exhibited every facet of fundamental excellence in the course of his career. Might review him soon, see if he ever put it all together. He was so strategically well developed that he was able to do with some ranges, even really unexpectedly, like Diaz I.

    I don't want to get into another argument about this, but some people seem to be selecting fighters that are superb out-boxers but lack in-fighting skill. Not a fundamental boxer.
     
    Blaxx likes this.
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,276
    38,833
    Mar 21, 2007
    Here's an interesting thing about Harold Johnson; he reached a fair bit at HW, just the physical limitations of his reach. It's interesting, because he is indeed a great example of a great fundamental boxer but he's one who, on much of the readily available footage, committed a cardinal fundamental sin, upsetting his balance to try to land a punch his opponent wasn't necessarily on the end of.

    But what else could he do? Not throw? Of course not. It's a conundrum.