The triple fraud, why you think he is fighting a bum next? Because thats his thing! He is never been An élite fighter! Just the biggest hype job in the business
yeyo monster, the hate on here shows otherwise. History shows us that elite fighters that are outside of UK/US are being hated hard. Exactly the GGG cause. And with all the respect to Canelo, but Golovkin resume atleast in my book, and in many more i guess it`s 40 - 0.
There's a fair difference between being a yes man and media savy. I think it would be expected that Sanchez be gracious about the offical score but supportive of his fighter. Not say 'G lost' when to most people it was a hottly disputed decision. If that was Sanchez's opinion he should've told GGG privately..... like elite coaches do in other sports.
Sanchez is not obligated to lie when the media asks him what he thought about the outcome of the fight. The only people that cry about the decision are Golovkin, Loeffler the weasel, and the GGGoons. Many trainers anf professional boxers felt Canelo won, including several all time great fighters such as Roberto Duran. I rather side with their perspective of the fight than some low paid, below average reporter covering boxing. So again, why would anyone expect Sanchez to be dishonest when confronted with the question of what his opinion of the fight was? You realize that by him lieing he is only fueling the hysteria of a corruption that he and many others don't believe was there specifically for that fight, further putting the sport that he obviously loves in bad light.
So you think the judges were bought off then? Lol oh deary me. Look man, it's easier than all that you posted. -The judges that are picked by the commission not the promoter, even though in this case team GGG was allowed to approve them which is not the standard. -The fight was close. -The judges felt Canelo beat Golovkin. -Abel Sanchez felt Canelo deserved the win. -Many fans, pro fighters, pro trainers, and All Time Great fighters felt Canelo won. -The VAST MAJORITY of the press who did score it for Golovkin did so by a SINGLE round. I reiterate, the fight was close!!! -Only the haters and die hard Golovkin lovers are crying foul to this day. Almost a year later. Whether you and a lot of Golovkin fans or fans in general thought G won is irrelevant. It won't change anything to cry about it day after day, month after month or year after year. Many fans felt Canelo won, many boxing people felt Canelo won, AND the judges felt Canelo won, and that's what matters.. End of story. This content is protected
I dont call it honest, I call it stupid -- very stupid.And so are you. That stuff is not meant for the public.
I donn't agree you on almost all of this. He may not be 'obligated to lie' but if you have a long standing professional relationship and a friendship with someone you use your words with consideration to that whether or not he thought GGG won or lost. Anyone who has spent anytime with the media knows that they will ask questions that can lead to controverisal answers. Binary questions. You don't say yes or no. You give the third view. eg:- Q- 'Did you think G won'. A:- 'he fought the fight he wanted and was able to follow his game plan. I thought he fought well'. No controversy, no headlines business as usual. Behind closed doors is the place for brutal truths.
What kind of fan are you? I despise the answers you demand. I appreciate straight shooters. Maybe I'm too old school for your taste, but I appreciate clarity and truth l. F*** hurt feelings.
Too Old School? so loyalty is new school. I'm simply saying that talking to the media is a game and if you don't play it smart you end up in the middle of s***situations. I don't demand any answers. Straight shooters are great but there's a time and a place man and selling your guy out in the media isn't either of those. 'F*** hurt feelings' - Abel also has hurt feelings so you want to F*** him too? You keep trying to turn this situation into this guys 100% right and that guys 100% wrong. Life doesn't always work that way. Abel owed GGG some loyalty and the media nothing regard;ess of the result, the judges, b/c they were a team.
I like this interview. Garcia is usually pretty on point and unbiased with interviews and you can really see it here. It’s good that he looked at both the fighter and the trainers point of view and made good points for both.