Froch completely biased!

What the hell was Froch talking about, he constantly sided with Jacobs when Saul clearly outscored Danny, Saul looked weary at times but was always in control, why was Froch so biased?

 

The other commentators were biased towards Canelo the first 6 rounds he was just balancing them out

 

No bias, just an idiot.

 

Carl Froch is a professional, he is just doing what he is paid to do.

 

So biased he scored a draw?

 

Judging fights as we know is quite subjective but Froch was not far of with 2 judges scoring it 115-113. I like Jacobs but feel Canelo deserves the verdict tonight as he was better technically especially in the first half of the fight then he slowed down. Jacobs was not as precise or accurate and looked sloppy or perhaps Canelo made him look like that.

 

Eddie Hearn tells those guys what to say, big money on the line.

 

With his head and waist movements, Canelo kept Jacobs off balance all night. The only time Jacobs touched Canelo with more than one punch at a time was when he slapped with his punches, shots that had next to nothing on them.
Froch was giving Jacobs credit for swinging and missing.

 

Obviously. This doesn't require a thread.

 

he has his own agenda, I think they'll drop him eventually

 

Froch although a very good fighter is just salty. He was talking crap about Ggg losing to a 5'7" inch fighter and he would destroy Ggg.

 

If a draw is a stretch then it biased scoring.

 

Jacobs was completely outclassed the first 6 rounds and just avoided getting hit more by backing off and not punching much.

 

I had just finished watching the fight and was pissed off, he`s a dreadful commentator.

 

He said he would give it to Jacobs and that he didn`t like the star being given the verdict, he ssaid Jacobs should have won because he was busier, WTF?