The irony. You’re ridiculously bias towards wilder and very anti AJ and Hearn. You said Hearn would have offered Ortiz 500k for the fight and then you said he should offer what Miller got and then you still slated Hearn. Everyone can see your agenda.
I routinely defend Wilder against idiots who bash him 24/7 around here. When the stupidity of the anti-Wilder posts drives me nuts. You have to admit, the bashers outnumber people like me tenfold. And I like Eddie Hearn, but he is a boxing promoter. And they all have their own agendas. And he's a great promoter for Joshua. But he isn't doing a great job for guys like Whyte. When the Eddie Hearn praise goes over the top, I bash Hearn. And for the thousandth time, I said Ortiz should take what Hearn offers him. I never said Ortiz should turn down the fight, ever. I don't know where you guys get that from, but people bring it up constantly and I never said it. I have no agenda other than to come here and talk about boxing. With that, enjoy your day. Or night, wherever you're from.
Where did I say in that post that you said Ortiz should turn down the fight? I wrote you said Hearn would have lowballed him when you knew nothing about numbers and you carried on slating Hearn saying he should give him the Miller offer which he did.
i remember holmes was critized for fighting evangalista/zanon/occasio/cobb/weaver/ etc etc at the begiining of his reign because the fights were all so easy because holmes was so good and dominant and his opposition so woeful / but he was recognised as by far the best most talented fighter at the time he did have a chip on his shoulder though so was not warmed to by the media lewis was a big doubt in the usa media because he was british not because of his talent when he destroyed ruddock and bowe threw the belt in the bin the perception of lewis changed and he was recognised as a very good fighter in the usa from then on . wilder is what he is a big puncher with an unorthodox style but legit all time power /he gets critized because for 39 of his 41 fights his management have picked the soft option when chosing his opposition his last 2 fights have been legit and the ortiz win was very good v an awkward fighter wilder boxing abilty was exposed v fury/ but fury did that to wlad as well until ortiz and fury and ortiz i would say wilder has been flying under the radar in america the public not bothered one way or the other because of his opposition/ now he is stepping up he will get more recognition.
Son of a preacher man, who wants a body on his record. Has one belt, but wants 50-50 with the guy who has 4 belts. Calls AJ out, but won't sign to fight him even for 120 million. Can't sell out an arena, but refuses to fight the guy who sells out soccer stadiums. And some of y'all still support this fraud...
You have a gift Holler mate; I was going to say I hope you save these-- but it's the net so they can't be scrubbed easily anyway.
Real real trash. It’s leaking everywhere. Great athlete no doubt one of best when it comes to speed and power. Still stinks like a decaying ass.
Ta mr deal it's very kind of you to say so. I don't (save them) but at times recently I wished I did because I don't want to repeat myself and have had to search to see if I've already done one for a boxer/incident. Maybe I should stick them in one thread and then those who can't stand them can more easily avoid them? I imagine my situation is much like that of Samuel Coleridge, just as he wouldn't wish to inadvertently plagiarise himself in 'Kubla Khan' so I have no wish to once again embark upon 'Stop the sucking of Ortiz'. Although of course *I'm not comparing the two. Coleridge would surely sooner have written about boxing and not sacred rivers or daffodils, if only he'd had the opportunity... *note to he humourless *******s / Americans the following is not serious and I know the doggerel i spew is bollocks
