Who fucking cares, you stupid piece of shit? Why did you even bother quoting me, you worthless little worm? Don't ever do so again, you're too far beneath me. Actually the ant is too majestic a creature for you, admin please change this punk's username to @ mark dungbeetle or @ mark aids virus or something. Whether or not you think GGG is greater than Kessler all time has NOTHING to do with how I choose to structure a list of my favorite all time fighters. It absolutely is NOT up to your dumb ass who I do or don't like. Stay the hell out of my mentions and keep my name out ya damn mouth as you creepy-crawl through life breathing in & out of it. NEVER quote me again, or you're banned.
No clue who mark aids virus is (so don’t take it personal) but I felt a strong urge to point a finger and Nelson laugh at him.
You set a shining example. The rest of you, be like @Floating Ghost, point and laugh @ mark dung beetle/aids virus, whichever you feel like calling him.
It honestly depends on what turns up against Pacquiao. At this point, nobody has a clue what version of Thurman will turn up. If it's the Thurman from the last fight, then Pacquiao will have an easy night's work. If it's a good Thurman that turns up then it's a good fight which I expect Thurman to win by a close decision.
Daaaaaamn! A little harsh, bro. I'm no fan of @mark ant (hell, his user name alone got me all fucked up—like WTF is a Mark Ant???) as I find his threads to contain the intellectual nourishment of iceberg lettuce, but he's as harmless as a non disease-carrying mosquito. Very, very annoying individual though.
He intimated that I shouldn't have Kessler in my boxing Mount Rushmore. You must not really KSAIB if you don't see how in my view that's a declaration of war.
Up until his "comeback" I was of the firm position that Keith was the apex predator of the WW division. I actually have a bit of concern of this fight. an over the hill Pac is still too much for the vast majority of guys and Keith looked extremely vulnerable in his comeback at times. His movement was phenomenal and he still showed he could pot shot and get himself out of trouble, but if Manny lands flush like Lopez did, Keith is finished, and I say that as a big fan. Also, somebody on here called Danny Garcia "mediocre". Danny has one of the best resumes at WW/JWW so that is an utterly moronic thing to even say.
No - wtf is the matter with you, kemosabe? Do you even realize the irony of your statement? This all started when I mentioned the names in my personal boxing Mt. Rushmore - something that is very clearly a matter of subjective opinion - and pissant decided to ungraciously butt in and force his opinion as to why I ought to make room for Golovkin but not Kessler down my throat, as though it were his place to do that, as though it weren't utterly disrespectful of him. Now, he clearly has something going on, probably on the spectrum of something, but you know what? Too bad. He needs to be able to dial the 'sperg down a few notches. It shouldn't be the rest of the world's problem that he never learned to properly socialize himself, and sometimes you need to learn these lessons the hard way. He oughtta know by now, as you oughtta know, and everybody on here - cardinal rule on these forums is you do not fuck with IB on the matter of Mikkel Kessler. You don't tug on superman's cape, you don't spit into the wind, and you don't give IB no sass when it comes to the Viking Warrior. Common sense.
Yeah, One Time v.2.0 doesn't inspire nearly as much faith as the first-run version, but if he beats Pacquiao impressively he's still in the conversation for top welter.
