It's not 'silly' and I'm not 'daft', since I'm not the one who is claiming a boxer is the hardest puncher ever with practically no evidence to support that claim. It's you who is silly and daft, since you're making an EXTRAORDINARY claim about Wilder being the hardest puncher ever. And EXTRAORDINARY claims require EXTRAORDINARY evidence. As such, you need to provide EXTRAORDINARY evidence that proves Wilder is the hardest puncher ever. Otherwise, you expose yourself as being daft and silly. If Wilder was really the hardest puncher ever as your claim he is, there shouldn't be ABSOLUTELY any excuse for Wilder failing to even drop, much less KO Johann Duhaupas who has slightly above average durability. The fact that Wilder failed to even drop Duhaupas in 11 rounds, despite landing flush, maximum powered loaded up punches, consisting of career high number of punches which amounted to over 500, disproves any claims of Wilder being the hardest puncher ever. Likewise, the same is the case with Eric Molina. Only Wilder needed the highest number of punches and most number of rounds to (unconvicingly) finish off Molina. Whilst Molina was knocked out cleanly twice in the first round before he fought Wilder and Joshua carried him to the third round before effortlessly finishing him off! These are facts which prove Wilder simply could not be the hardest puncher ever. In fact, it's questionable if Wilder is even the hardest puncher today, much less ever.
