One of the judges had AJ ahead and winning

I figured you knew, and in essence you were correct. I was not trying to be pedantic but a lot of people on this forum are pretty bad (not meaning you) at understanding the
Nuances of scoring and decisions.

 

I dont know why I typed majority instead of split.

It's silly really though when you think of it that the majority of the judges did call it for 'fighter a' or 'fighter b' but it is a split decision as all 3 judges were not unanimous in their conclusion.they were split.

 

I remember the first time realizing it.
Boxing is odd.

"Squared circle"

 

In context though ruiz lasts two knockdown wouldn't of been included in the scoring rounds. However how he was even then still not 3 rounds up is beyond me.

The katie taylor fight I had the other bird winning 2/3 rounds up and I thought josh Kelly was 1 maybe 2 down on the cards personally.

 

What do you mean by 3 rounds up? (muh English is what it is)How many round do you think Ruiz clearly won?

 

Disgusting if true. Joshua was getting soundly beaten.

 

Sorry,I meant at least 3 points up. That's only my opinion and I'm firmly a Joshua Fan for what it's worth.

 

So 58-55.
Give one of those rounds to Joshua and it's suddenly 57-56.
4-2 and 3-3 IMO seem both fair. I don't think 4-2 Joshua is really possible. But then again not much happened in the 4th round.

 

ī

Definitely agree with your point there. It was meerly my opinion. We all view things differently and it's healthy to have such discussions lol

 

It was a corrupt Eddie Hearn card . Katie Taylor somehow got a win aswell

 

And one of Mathrooms brightest prospects walked away with a draw(which was the most fair outcome).
And Ruiz was actually up on the cards.
The Taylor cards were bad tho.