False. Two networks can legally work together to host a fight without breaching any contractual terms. . Regardless all of BT network talk came after Hearn had rejected the offer before he knew what terms were included in the contract. He kept insisting that Shelly and Al haymon show proof of funds insinuating that it was a bogus offer.
That's hardly AJs fault that Warren and Hearns won't get on is it But it was in the contract... So he wouldn't have been able to take the deal anyway Because it was, PBC get 50 mill a year for boxing. So where is 50m for one guy coming from? Hearn knew this, and didn't actually ask them for proof of funds, he said he wanted a contract
Oh my not this again. You do realise PBC funded the biggest fight in boxing history which earned each fighter over 400 million? The point about the contract, whether you believe a deal could have been brokered or not, is that both Hearn and Joshua both outright refused the 50 million as they did not wish to fight in america Again you are making up your own stories to suit your own desired narative, as Eddie Hearn is on camera asking for proof of funds. They're on record stating as such and Barry Hearn himself was on twitter celebrating rejecting the 50 million deal. Matchroom and Joshua are record stating they wished to wait until 2020 to fight because they didn't feel ready and Joshua complained about Wilder having more experience.
