Top Ten Ring Magazine rated opponents beaten since 1990, Heavyweight title holders.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Jul 1, 2019.



  1. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,299
    16,055
    Jun 25, 2014
    Then post the monthly issue ratings. Because Solis isn't rated in the Ring ratings (which you told us to use) three months before his fight with Vitali. And he isn't rated after he lost, either. http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2010

    And Arreola isn't listed in the ratings (which you told us to use) six months before he fought Vitali. http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2008

    And Kevin Johnson isn't listed in the ratings (which you told us to use) in either annual Ring rating posted in 2009 (March and December) the year he fought Vitali. Kevin Johnson never appeared in any Ring annual rating - before or after fighting Vitali. http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2008
    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2009

    And here is Stiverne ... ranked 7th. http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2016

    So, they ranked Stiverne. Did not rank Odlanier Solis, Chris Arreola and Kevin Johnson. You must be confusing RING ratings with WBC ratings. And BOXREC drops people who haven't fought in a year. Not RING.

    You set the rules. According to your Rules, Vitali has five. And Wilder has four, and is about to engage in his fifth.
     
    Last edited: Jul 2, 2019
    Rainer and Rumsfeld like this.
  2. sweetsci

    sweetsci Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,880
    1,796
    Jan 22, 2008
    The Wilder-Stiverne rematch was held in November 2017. Steverne's last Ring ratings appearance was back in January 2017.

    Kevin Johnson was rated 10th in the January 2010 Ring, ratings as of October 18th. I don't have the ratings from the following issue; I don't know if he held onto that ranking going into the December Vitali fight.

    Chris Arreola was rated 6th in the December 2009 Ring, ratings as of September 18th. He fought Vitali on September 26th.

    Much can change in boxing from month-to-month. Using the annual ratings from BoxRec needs to be done with caution. Unfortunately, finding old monthly rankings is a difficult task, so BoxRec's annual ratings is a good tool. But, again, it needs to be done with caution.
     
    Rumsfeld and Mendoza like this.
  3. sweetsci

    sweetsci Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,880
    1,796
    Jan 22, 2008
    Tyson and Ruddock were ranked by Ring #2 and #3, respectively, going into both bouts.
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  4. sweetsci

    sweetsci Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,880
    1,796
    Jan 22, 2008
    Correct, Tubbs wasn't rated by Ring.
    Coetzer wasn't either, but he was #8 in Ring's sister publication, KO. Go figure.
    Donald was #7.
    Hide was #6.

    These are from the monthly issues using the "as of" date closest to before the fight, NOT the annual ratings on Boxrec.
    Unfortunately, during some years I was more diligent than other years about saving ratings from magazines. Thus I don't have anything from after March 1995, 1996, or 1997, so I can't help with Bowe's later bouts.
     
    Mendoza likes this.
  5. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,299
    16,055
    Jun 25, 2014
    Yes. I had Hide. Not Donald.

    Not as many as you would think, regardless.
     
    sweetsci likes this.
  6. sweetsci

    sweetsci Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,880
    1,796
    Jan 22, 2008
    Correct, Moorer was not ranked going into the Tua fight.
    Oquendo was not ranked going into the Byrd fight.
    I don't have the issues before the Klitschko - Gomez fight; can't help you there.
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  7. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,265
    Jun 29, 2007
    You don't understand the rules.

    You are posting links to Ring ANNUAL ratings. Ring Magazines MONTHLY change through the year, often as fighters win or lose. I am certain Solis and Johnson were ranked when Vitali fought them because I remember reading them, Arerola too.

    If you understand the above, Wilder has beaten just two ring magazine ranked guys when he fought them. Vitali four times that amount.

    But this isn't a show how under accomplished Wilder is type of thread, I was hoping to get facts here from 1990 to current.
     
  8. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,265
    Jun 29, 2007
    You get it, 100%.

    Stiverne wasn't ranked for the re-match.

    Johnson I knew was 10th. I wasn't sure where Arreola was in the top ten but I knew he was there. I'm 95% sure Solis was 9th. Can you very that as well?
     
  9. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    48,614
    12,707
    Jul 19, 2004
    Somewhat strange then, that he was ranked following the loss to Byrd. I know a lot of people thought Oquendo deserved to win that one, so I guess the strength of his effort was deemed good enough to include him after.
     
  10. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist Full Member

    21,702
    12,329
    Apr 3, 2012
    Hve Schultz and Botha been confirmed? They didn’t crack annual ratings.
     
  11. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,299
    16,055
    Jun 25, 2014
    I understand the rules as you wrote them.

    Deontay Wilder - Bermane Stiverne 1, Bermane Stiverne 2, Luis Ortiz 1, Tyson Fury 1 and now he's fighting Luis Ortiz again.

    Four going on five.

    And, as I said to you in another thread, Wilder fighting guys ranked highly for YEARS by RING trumps Vitali fighting Kevin Johnson (who was rated #10 when he signed to fight Vitali and was apparently rated for eight weeks) and never was rated again ... because Kevin Johnson had no business ever being ranked in the RING top 10 to begin with.

    Anyone who had a ring #10 rating for a MONTH is deemed by you to be as good as facing a RING champ. It's the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life.

    The quality of the RING ratings varies drastically at times. Some years, a guy like Eddie Chambers is as high as #3, and some years guys who beat Eddie Chambers (like Gerald Washington) never get considered because, by then, the top 10 is filled with a helluva lot better guys than Eddie Chambers.

    Simply counting anyone who briefly showed up for a whiff at #10 the same as fighting someone who has been highly rated by Ring for FOUR CONSECUTIVE YEARS is laughable and agenda driven.

    But then again, you know that.

    That's all. I'm not wasting any more time on this.
     
    Rainer likes this.
  12. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    48,614
    12,707
    Jul 19, 2004
    Maybe not, but I maintain he probably had a stronger case than Gomez.
     
  13. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,299
    16,055
    Jun 25, 2014
    WE GET IT.

    Oh GREAT! Stiverne, who was ranked by RING from 2012 to 2017 briefly dropped out of the ratings before fighting Wilder, so you can take him off Wilder's list and ADD Kevin Johnson to Vitali's, because he was #10 in the ratings for eight weeks before Vitali fought him.

    No agenda at all.

    What a joke.
     
  14. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,299
    16,055
    Jun 25, 2014
    You just don't understand the rules, Rumsfeld. (wink)

    Vitali beat Juan Carlos Gomez.

    And, in this exercise, beating Gomez and Kevin Johnson IS BETTER than Douglas toppling Tyson.

    Because you see, Gomez and Johnson were TWO RING ranked Fighters, and Tyson was just ONE.

    And whether you were the Undisputed champ and appeared in the ratings for a decade or you were rated #10 for eight weeks and were never seen again, one win over a Ring top 10 guy counts the same as any other.

    No agenda, of course.
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  15. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    48,614
    12,707
    Jul 19, 2004
    Well, in fairness to @Mendoza - I am fond of these types of comparisons, and I think this thread is already proving interesting. I won't accuse him of necessarily having an agenda, although it is a bit curious that he missed several names from Lennox.

    Interestingly enough, if we stepped this back to include all of Larry's career, I imagine Holmes would score mighty fine.

    :smoking: