Dillian Whyte tests positive for banned substance

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by wallworkjake123, Nov 6, 2012.



Is Dillian is innocent?

  1. Yes

    54 vote(s)
    26.5%
  2. No

    125 vote(s)
    61.3%
  3. Who Cares?

    25 vote(s)
    12.3%
  1. CutThroatFade

    CutThroatFade Rangers FC Full Member

    15,970
    25,824
    May 25, 2015
    I hope they go Rocchigiani on Hearn and the WBC's ass and get Rivas installed as mandatory with the result overturned.
     
    Scissors, Unforgiven and themaster999 like this.
  2. CutThroatFade

    CutThroatFade Rangers FC Full Member

    15,970
    25,824
    May 25, 2015
    If it makes you feel better there's probably a reason why Chisora linked up with Haye to "maximise his training" and achieve the "marginal gains" required for world level.

    It starts with "dr" and ends in "ugs".
     
  3. Harry Bearn

    Harry Bearn New Member banned Full Member

    71
    26
    Jun 15, 2019
    (3) If he loses it doesn't count as DW was doping , no lose situation
     
  4. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,585
    11,047
    Oct 28, 2017
    I think a lot of it was just exhaustion, like Chisora's against Takam. So I don't find it especially suspicious.

    That said, I'd be surprised if Whyte just started doping for the Rivas fight.
     
  5. Erik

    Erik Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,627
    2,766
    Oct 25, 2015
    So he failed before the fight and it would seem that Hearn must have known but kept it to himself.:lol:

    Has anti-drug white knight Tony Bellend been approached for comment yet?
     
    stittyb, S.K and BitPlayerVesti like this.
  6. ArseBandit

    ArseBandit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,176
    1,859
    Apr 22, 2012
    Wonder how often they introduce new tests for matabolites with longer half-lives? Do they only test **** or do they test hair as well?

    I don't trust the testing agencies tbh. Capitalism speaks £££££

    This being a leak from an inside source and that we haven't heard anything from UKAD or BBBoC, and the way Eddie's been talking over the last week about PED's knowing this scream cover up to me. Doesn't seem like they expected it to come out.

    Are there any over cases where a fighter has tested positive before the fight and the fight has gone on without informing the opponent? Where the BBBoC have sanctioned the fight due to protocol?

    If this is weed so be it. IDC. But I suspect if it was we'd have been told that by now.
     
    CutThroatFade likes this.
  7. Special one

    Special one Active Member Full Member

    1,015
    1,025
    Mar 20, 2019
    Wilders comments are ridiculous considering he chose to fight a drug banned Fury and now has a second fight lined up against drug cheat Ortiz!! His statement reminds me of the way Miller spoke of Joshua and we all know how that came back to bite him!!
     
  8. Jobo1878

    Jobo1878 Active Member Full Member

    567
    125
    Mar 12, 2011
    That is what I have been thinking too, this fight was essentially a gimme. Why risk it in just this fight alone?
     
  9. CutThroatFade

    CutThroatFade Rangers FC Full Member

    15,970
    25,824
    May 25, 2015
    It's all a cover up mate. Hearn literally knew about this before the fight, didn't say a word, tried to get an injunction in court and spent the week slating drug cheats!

    If anyone really now believes that there is no credence to Joshua's TUE allegations you are living on another planet. It's all hush hush.
     
  10. Trafford

    Trafford Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,105
    2,938
    Sep 29, 2018
    It costs $30k for VADA testing per fight. Any other testing is simply an IQ test. The board is a **** test and unless you are mid cycle you are not getting caught. The truth is there lots of fighters on PEDS and I would love it to stop but the only way is to do UFC style year round testing and even then it’s open to abuse as the UFC pays for it they can cover up what they want. See Jon Jones. We need a worldwide governing body. Similar to the olympics that everyone pays into.
     
  11. Harry Bearn

    Harry Bearn New Member banned Full Member

    71
    26
    Jun 15, 2019
    I think the issue may be that until the B sample is tested there is little the BBBC can do but sanction the fight.

    Don't sanction and the B sample exonerates the boxer (very unlikely I know) then the BBBC are nuts deep from all sides.

    Just one of those things, will all be forgotten and everyone will move on in a couple of weeks.
     
  12. Puroresu_Fan

    Puroresu_Fan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,802
    6,596
    Apr 6, 2016
    The one thing right about Wilder's statement was Whyte trying talking **** about AJ while dude seems to be cheating himself.
     
  13. ArseBandit

    ArseBandit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,176
    1,859
    Apr 22, 2012
    Is there a precedent for this though? Has it happened before? If it has I can't remember it.

    Hearn's behaviour knowing this is very suspicious. If there's one thing Hearn has it's media savvy. If he knew and expected this to come out I can't see him talking about Pac the way he did. He's a snake
     
  14. Plaistow

    Plaistow Member Full Member

    294
    358
    Jul 20, 2019
    Mad how you know all the details, all the angles already...
     
  15. Harry Bearn

    Harry Bearn New Member banned Full Member

    71
    26
    Jun 15, 2019
    Is there a precedent for only taking an A sample without testing the B?