Jeff Powell of the daily mail saying it’s three different substances that have been found ?!?! Wtf and Hearn let the fight go on knowing this ?
I still can't believe people buy the Jack3d excuse from years ago, if you look at pictures of Whyte from years ago he has obviously been juicing from a young age, he is absolutely muscle bound bit of fat covering it but huge muscle wise I wonder what the likes of Miller and Whyte are popping ped wise though to have such high punch outputs for essentially fat lads Also the recent knockout thing shares an similarity with Khan under Conte and co, where he was all of a sudden knocking people out, going toe to toe with Maidana
It's equally suggestive of a situation where an adverse finding was found and Hearn chucked some brown envelopes about to make it go away and allow the fight to happen. By all accounts this news may have been leaked to the journalist who broke the story. Until Hearn and Matchroom and Whyte squeeze their testicles back out and summon the courage to draft a proper statement, nobody knows what the **** happened here.
Dillian Whyte Tested Positive For Two Dianabol Metabolites the substances were epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone, two metabolites of the banned drug Dianabol. Dinabol is a big muscle builder, obviously packing on the muscle ergo more power,
Yep. He had and still has to an extent horrific gyno as well. He has the look of a classic steroid user who is using either poor quality drugs or follows a terrible diet whilst using drugs. From what we know of Dillian, he's not the sharpest tool in the box so it's probably both.
It has been reported he tested positive for two Dianabol metabolites. https://www.*******.com/dillian-whyte-tested-positive-two-dianabol-metabolites--141198 The amount of epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone found in Whyte's "A" sample was very small. It could have been ingested as part of a supplement rather than the direct ingestion of Dianabol tablets. But the WADA standard for epimethandienone and hydroxymethandienone is qualitative, not quantitative. In order words, any amount of epimethandienone or hydroxymethandienone in an athlete's system is a violation of the WADA code.
He's massive gyno pretty much bang on clue he is a big time and long time steroid user, lucky he's dark skinned or the spots on his back would show up more
What kind of supplement contains dianabol. If this is true then I really believe it could be intentional dianabol consumption. Whyte's watery bloated but muscular physique SCREAMS dianabol.
A couple of things come to mind for me. Am I correct in saying that until the B sample is tested Whyte hasn't failed a test for PEDs? If he hasn't yet failed a test and the results of his A test was not officially released by the testing body is Whyte a victim under GDPR legislation? "In the case of a personal data breach, the controller shall without undue delay and, where feasible, not later than 72 hours after having become aware of it, notify the personal data breach to the supervisory authority competent in accordance with Article 55, unless the personal data breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons. Article 33 - Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority GDPR" "physical, material or non-material damage to natural persons such as loss of control over their personal data or limitation of their rights, discrimination, identity theft or fraud, financial loss, unauthorised reversal of pseudonymisation, damage to reputation, loss of confidentiality of personal data protected by professional secrecy or any other significant economic or social disadvantage to the natural person concerned. Recital 85 GDPR" https://www.gdprdecoded.com/gdpr-guide/gdpr-data-breaches It might be possible that UKAD and BBBOC could be in serious legal trouble, both civil and criminal. Hauser may have to reveal his source as a part of any investigation if it is deemed a criminal matter. Whyte is meant to have training at Loughborough. Was he receiving any sports science support there, the type of thing where the athlete's blood is taken to monitor hormone levels, nutrient levels etc? If they did do this type of monitoring there might be evidence to show innocence, guilt, a false positive due to other reasons or a fault in UKAD's testing.
Doesn't explain anything so was a pointless Press release. Na journalists are protected and rightly so.
UKAD have to follow the protocol. Under UK law you are innocent until proven guilty. If the case carries on he could fight again until they decide to bring charges. Hughie Fury fought 6 times after his test before charges were bought against him. Same thing happened to Eric Molina. British bureaucracy at it's best.
Wonder if this explains Whyte’s mood before the fight, saying how p****d off he was to Sky at the weigh in.