Interviewer seemed nervous but Eddie had his spiel ready to go, can’t mention much. My bet is VADA found nothing and the traces UKAD found where so minute it couldn’t possibly enhance his performance and Dillian was neglegent by using his hotels toothpaste rather than the Colgate that’s provided.
So Whyte attended an enquiry before the fight and was cleared to fight . Move on , nothing to see here.
Think that’s the but Eddie is referring to that’ll get him in trouble mentioning. If he’s attended a hearing and was cleared it’s nothing. A simple statement mentioning this would have done. The silence makes people question more.
You can't even really tell how much someone has ingested based on how much has been found. It's hard to find a ton of info, but wiki said a metabolite was discovered in 2006 to be detectable with mass spectrometry for 19 days after a 5mg dosage. It could either be a small contamination recently, from the dodgy back alley butchers and off brand online supplements all the millionaire athletes use for some reason, or it could just have the length of time between taking it and the testing. Anyway there's no allowed level of Dianabol. Also how the **** has it been addressed like Hearn keeps saying when they haven't even tested the B sample yet?
This isn’t going to just go away, mate. They made a decision a few days before that the fight goes ahead, however, you’ve now got the WBC and Rivas both saying that they weren’t informed of this, and that’s wrong. The WBC have been looking for an excuse to not give moaning ‘hard done by’ Whyte a title shot...well they’ve got one now.
Do we actually have anything confirmed here? All I've heard is that Eddie Hearn has said Whyte has been cleared and they had an 'issue' and said that the fight could go ahead after attending a meeting or whatever it was. Eddie has not confirmed that Whyte has taken a banned substance. (Or maybe he has and we can make this post completely irrelevant, be sure to tell me otherwise) I may be wrong in the end, but this seems all a bit suspicious to me. Boxing Scene come out with an article about this, and then a few hours later come out with an article about Wilder slamming Whyte for cheating. Smells of a green WBC biased fish to me. Could it be that the Wilder Bodyguard Council have made up and escalated a non-story so they can have an excuse to remove Whyte's mandatory position? Unless I see an actual confirmation that he cheated, this to me is an onslaught by the WBC to make up excuses!
I get the hearing but if the substances mentioned are true we still need to know how has that ended up in Whyte's system.
Any journalist printing info without double sourced information is a total idiot. I can't see how that could have happened.