This is a good vid that argue`s well against my theory but I still don`t think Dempsey faced a jab as long as AJ`s: This content is protected
Clearly Jack Dempsey would win. You know....because he boxed in the 1920's so clearly he was more skilled than Anthony Joshua. Oh and Jack Dempsey did beat Jess Willard. Sure Willard was crude even for that era standards but who cares. Jess Willard boxed back in the day so clearly no modern skilled, modern athletic, modernly styled fighter could beat him. Oh should I add boxers back then wore 4 ounce gloves? So Dempsey would win by getting his blood all over Joshua's face when Anthony Joshua knocked him out in 15 seconds.
Yeah but you aren't very bright though. So does your opinion mean anything to anybody? Well besides the other senile brain dead old people on the Classic Forum should not be allowed to be on the internet.
The funny thing is if 1 person said Jack Dempsey would beat Anthony Joshua it would be disturbing. But then you realize there are tons of mentally challenged people who actually think this. A bunch of extremely low IQ old senile males who still can't grasp that boxing has evolved. A bunch of senile old males who can't grasp there are weight classes for reasons. A bunch of senile old males who can't grasp that being considered good one era doesn't equate to being good for another era.
Awe..man that hurt my feelings. Your not a very nice person. I'm gonna go on with my day despite insult. Have you ever tried walking and chewing gum at the same time? If you can master that maybe you wouldnt be such an angry young lady. Instead of lashing out on your dad's computer.
But were not senile enough not too realize Joshua's fight game is on a amateur level at best when compared to some of the greats from the past. Not senile enough not to realize a fighter that has to catch his 2nd wind by the 5th rd , should have serious questions about his endurance. Not senile enough not to see Joshua has been hurt, and put on his ass by multiple fighters during his relatively short career, that should lead to serious questions about his ability to take a shot. Not senile enough not to realize the fact Joshua showed some quit in him when he realized he wasn't good enough to beat Ruiz Jr. And pretty much quit in the ring. Maybe were not senile at all. Maybe you don't live in reality of who Joshua is.
What about his muscles? Look at the guy! He's beautiful! You can't blame her vision for being clouded. After all she is defending her man.
Do you really believe that everybody on an internet forum is a senile old male? You do seem to believe that you are the only person in the world who is right, and that everybody else is an idiot!
No you are beyond senile. You have severe mental issues. Sometimes I wonder who is more simple minded. These Millennials or these old brain dead farts like you. Clearly the older generation is far more stupid. Joshua is slow and unskilled compared to modern standards. If you actually believe Jack Dempsey is more skilled than a guy who came along 90 years after him then you are beyond brain dead. If you aren't smart enough to realize boxing has changed a lot over the last 90 plus years then you shouldn't be watching boxing. Lol Joshua was knocked down by the 6'5 240 pound modern fighter Wladimir Klitschko and by 6'1 260 pound Andy Ruiz. He was hurt by 6'4 250 pound confirmed steroid user Dillian Whyte. So clearly that means a 6'0 190 pound guy could beat him right? Jack Dempsey was knocked out cold by 170-180 pound "Fireman" Jim Flynn but lets not talk about that right. See I will live in the reality where I can understand boxing has evolved. I will living in a world where weight classes exist for a reason. You can live in your little world where 6'0 180 to 190 pound unskilled fighters from 90 years could beat modern skilled fighters who out weigh him by 60 pounds.
Lol her? The last time I checked I was a man. Your should ask your mom about me. Also defending Joshua? Of you mean like you defend your little white boxing heroes like Marciano, Dempsey and Tunney for obvious reasons?
