I hate how there are so few trained journos these days. I think Eddie is a massive **** but he should have told that moron to do one a lot earlier.
There’s only a handful of good ones left and even then they’re in pockets of certain promoters and don’t want to upset them and rock the apple cart.
Yeah same with all sports. So ego child with a blog and they think their an award winning journalist. Agreed on that the decent ones are in the pockets
I think that journo just went about it the same way as most people (including on here) , like a bull in a china shop with very little accurate info. Thought Eddie was spot on with the stuff about testing in Ameria too, it’s absolutely shocking compared to here , no matter how bad we think the UKAD/VADA/BBBoC combination is its light years ahead of what is in place for most US fights.
I'd imagine most of these you tube guys have completed some sort of journalism or media course. Just goes to show the state of our education system these days.
Dianabol and nandrolone work. For brute strength, size and power "old school" anabolic steroids are still best. Possibly. Either way, I really doubt he's the first athlete trained at Loughborough to be caught for PEDs.
It seemed to me Eddie started the confrontational manner with the interviewer and demanding answers about "testing in America", saying "what are YOU doing ?", way before the interviewer did anything much to antagonize. He looks under pressure.
Dbol and nandrolone are still two of the best things to take to get passed testing. Dbol can be undectable within as little as 24 hours and the fail threshold for nandrolone is set ridiculously and unnaturally high to begin with.
This is why Hearn usually sticks to 'interviews' that consist of drinking Peroni with 'Koogs' who just nods in agreement as he tells us why Dave Allen vs Povetkin would be a legit fight.
So Hearn is suggesting Whyte's entire case was brought, heard and decided within a 36 hour period and he was cleared on the morning of the fight, and that's it, it's all over !
Funny you should mention that, this was uploaded a few minutes ago (IFL, but not Kugan) This content is protected
With UKAD I would not be surprised if that is the case. Again Hearn is just the promoter here and isn't the one who can answer the in and outs of how a drug panel came to this conclusion. The Board and UKAD should be the ones who are asked these questions.
I think they are trying to argue that Whyte was cleared to fight because he passed several tests (all his VADA tests) and only failed the one test (which was a UKAD test). Hearn's really pushing the line, "WHY did they clear him ? They must have had grounds." Hearn's asking people to SUPPORT Dillian Whyte in this, after all his moralizing about PEDs in sport ! LOL
If these doping agencies are getting the kind of figures being banded about for every fight then it's no surprise that they would dance to the tune of whatever promoter it is they are working for. The whole situation is a joke.
On the other hand if that was the case then why would they ever release information on said fighters failed test? I believe they are incompetent yes but corrupt, no.