Also I have to add that the UK knighted their own Lance Armstrong in Bradley Wiggins. Just think about the lunacy of this for a moment.
Yeah the Sky jiffy bag was highly suspicious, especially as no one could remember what was in it for months. And, of course you're right, they backdated Fury's ban and kept the whole process under wraps via their now infamous protocol. The list goes on. Maybe the leak in this case was from a source who had had enough of this bad practice and decided to force their hand and everything out into the open?
We are awaiting the B sample results and also the results of the hair test also. Of which I'm sure that what Whyte was alluding to. Serious question and apologies if I missed the awnser already. What's the importance of the hair test? And what results would that determine and I'm confused as to why this has been requested if there is already 2 samples
as Eddie said yesterday, there ain’t no B sample coming, he has been cleared by UKAD and then BBoC. The only thing Whyte needs to do now is spin it to the public who have him guilty.
"As long as Whyte’s B-sample is negative, this whole case should be done. Whyte can then move on to his next fight against someone later this year. " Also I am not a wilder fan. I actually hope that Whyte is found clean. If there has been reports of hearn saying there was no b sample he's back peddled since. I doubt he'd say such a thing because that would just sound dodgey. It would be the only drug test in history that didnt have a B sample
I"he’s 100 per cent innocent, which time will tell, it’s f***ing brutal what has happened to him, it’s going to be difficult" Another quote from hearn since. I legit couldn't find one place where he said he'd get to skip a b test.
I have no idea what on earth he is talking about, because a b sample is not a second sample. They take one sample and split it into an a and a b. The purpose of the b sample is to verify the a sample in the event of a positive result. This is really no different to any other type of analysis.
The b sample will come back positive - it always does. Whyte won't dispute that - he'll defend himself on the basis that it wasn't in his system in previous tests, ie with VADA, and claim this proves his exposure was inadvertent or accidental.
Correct so I don't get why Dylan supporters say no B test. And haters say no B test there is already a B sample they just have to reveal and then we go by there if it's a pass I'll trust the judgement of it being legit and we will have our answer.
Bit of an interesting one but the biggest problem is no one actually has any facts other than "Twitter" or rubbish media sites who also don;t have any facts.. I suspect Whyte has been passing tests except for this one and it shows something that really needs to be used long term to have any benefit so to take it once before a fight probs is pointless... The drug in question (if thats what was in his system cause again no "facts" have been shown) is not really a PED in the way a boxer would use unless he wanted to put on masses of big showy usless muscles.. Again just guessing like everyone else but it seems more likely than anything else...
What would be stopping him from storing the drug in his fat and having it appear in his urine because he burned through a some of the fat that contained the drug?