Dillian Whyte tests positive for banned substance

And what should happen next?

 

Facts are something dodgy occured and only one party was privvy to it

I dont care who but somebody should have informed Rivas
All this passing the buck as to who it should have been just makes it look so much worse

 

I don't care. He failed a test before a fight and blithely still fought regardless with the tacit approval of Hearn.

 

'I don't care who' sums up most people in this thread I'm afraid.

Have no clue as to how the process works or confidentiality clauses etc but have all the answers in this case, it does make you laugh.

 

Then if you don't care, you are in the wrong thread.

We are talking about Whyte's PED case, and who is dealing with it. UKAD and an independent panel at an NADP hearing, have dealt with it. And Edward Hearn of matchroom was not at that Hearing, and he was not informed by UKAD on the adverse findings.

Hearn does not approve UKAD findings, or VADA findings, or do the job of the BBBoC to let fighters fight. He is a promoter, he promotes things.

 

It is an ignorant response, I can deal with facts, I can deal with documentation saying something clearly, but I can't deal with people ignoring official documentation.

 

We have minimal information on the case, and everyone is acting like an expert, dishing out accusations and civilian arresst warrants...

Why does NADP even exist haha, **** the barristers, just send in 305th. Go get em' tiger.

 

Some people just let their hate for young Edward get in the way of the facts.

 

People would take you more seriously if your username was not Harry Bearn bro

 

Maybe , but I can't help my name.

I don't yearn approval from the forum muppets , their hate is quite impressive although slightly alarming for grown men (I assume).

 

Neither of us has anywhere near the insight or expertise to start throwing around small print and procedures.

 

There is a MARKED different between small print, and the ACTUAL OFFICIAL guidelines printed CLEARLY on the UKAD website for a VERY CLEAR purpose of educating the public and athletes on exactly what the hell UKAD do and how they do it.

Obviously, not everyone here has read it, and they are commenting like they have. Not on my watch.

But you know, forget it, if facts and logic are unpopular here I'll just stick to banter.

BBC News report incoming:

"A strange man in a Tuxedo calling himself 305th of BoxingForum24 was tackled to the ground today at 1.30PM following a failed attempt to enter an anti-doping hearing held by the NADP on the recent Whyte doping case. The man claimed to be an NADP consultant.
He was escorted from the premises after some ramblings about an internet user called GDamn or A-Damn?
Bystanders were startled."

 

@Harry Bearn You’re a troll.

@Aydamn He’s failed a test. You’re defending a two time drug cheat.

 

Well, kindly, if you don't mind Twenty, I'd like to hear it from someone official.

Thank you, and warm regards as always.

 

That did make me lol.