No, you are wrong. BBBoC would have suspended BJS if he tested positive for a substance that is banned by them. The substance BJS tested positive for was not banned by BBBoC (outside of competition). Where as, the substance Whyte tested positive for is banned by every council and commission.
Their bylaws on drug testing do not mention VADA. They say testing mandated and approved by local commissions are valid. They say anyone caught with a substance from the banned list in their his system is subject to penalty. They say any fighter who participates in any fight sanctioned by WBC agrees to these conditions. End of.
wbc and bbbc have members part of both orgs. Hearn might be able to wash away this from the UK folk but not world boxing, they need to come clean here, otherwise their UK shows might take a hit with opponents not going over anymore. Where does Sky fit in all this it must be hurting them esp if AJ now fights at silly o clock again
UKAD are a disgrace. They clearly haven’t learned from the mess with the Fury’s and are undermining themselves once again.
True. With Saunders though what he was caught with something that isn't on the banned list of UKAD who the board listen to so that puts them, once again, in a grey area.
BJS situation wasn’t quite the same, that was just stupidity and lack of professionalism. He failed by Vada standards but not every other doping agency, whom actually have the power to ban... It’s not the same as getting caught for dianabol...
PED's or not, it does not matter, he can be on all of that stuff and still gets flat out KO'ed against Wilder, that fight will be total let down...this has Breazale written all over it...with that leaky defense and routinely eating right hands even against hand picked cannon fodder he will get face planted like a cold fish.