Which point did I change? I said all along that fighters will turn up their best for the biggest fight of their life. Thats obvious. Are you too thick to understand that? So Broner is still young, physically prime and more motivated than ever? Why do you think he wont be at his best? Pac would have always destroyed Broner, I said way before the Maidana fight Pac destroys broner. Broner was never in that league. The guy struggled with PDL ffs. What is your point? He still turned up his best vs. Pac because it was the biggest fight of his life and he is physically prime. Now, if you can't differentiate between a prime guy being motivated for a fight vs unmotivated for a fight, and a scenario where a guy is motivated for a fight but he's too damm old, shot, damaged then I don't know what to say to you. You obviously lack simply critical thinking skills. You think Maidana turned up better vs Khan than Mayweather? Afterall, Khan took his soul right? God you're a fkin moron.
Strange that you say Thurman busted Pac up since after the fight Pac didn't look busted up. Thurman did.
I see something similar to this, late rounds towel goes in or ref waves a halt. I don't see the fight happening, pacs team should be smart enough to look elsewhere. Thurman was a winnable fight for pac and he just scrapped through, spence fight is not.
Thurman did look busted up but he busted Pac up as well and landed more power punches in the fight. With that said Pac won the fight.
No you lack critical thinking skills and have an agenda. You can't have your cake and eat it to. You can't say that a younger undefeated Broner wasn't as his best against Maidana who took his 0 but the one who was 3-2-1 in his last 6 fights, checked out and fighting for money was the best version we saw against Pac. We already heard Broner say against Mikey that he was in the best shape of his life and was going to make a statement, so what about that version? Anyone with an ounce of common sense would rate the Maidana win over Broner as a better win than the one Pac got over him. That's like me saying that the version of Victor Ortiz PBF beat was a better version and win than the version of Ortiz Maidana beat. Once again Maidana took a fighter's soul and handed them their first real loss and made them question whether or not they should be in the boxing game. The Ortiz that Maidana fought was being talked about as the next big star he was full of confidence Oscar was looking to make him a superstar, he was at his absolute best. You're just another ****boi fan who wants to prop up Pac's win over a checked out joke of a fighter Broner and will say anything to make sure that happens, but too bad for you people like me won't let you get away with it. In both fights Maidana fought the better versions he fought the better version of Broner and he fought the better version of Ortiz, he got the 2 best wins there. Pac did not beat the best version of Broner you ****ing idiot and his record and track history going into the fight proves it, he was seen as a joke going into the Pac fight but not seen as a joke going into the Maidana fight where he was a huge favorite. That's like saying PBF beat the best version of Zab Judah and has the better win over Tszyu and Kostya Tszyu's TKO win over him wasn't as good and he beat a lesser Zab, are you going to use the excuse that Zab didn't get up for Tszyu but he got up for PBF? LMFAO! It doesn't work like that. I understand that guys can get up for big fights but that doesn't automatically mean that's the best or better version of them, there's other factors that come into play. So log off you agenda having dumbass.
What’s Pacquiaos record against southpaws? I feel like Pacquiao is another Hopkins. He will lose to a guy seen below his level then when he is considered done gets a big win making it hard to pick. It’s not as though there are any all time great types floating around at 140 or 147 either
Broken ribs, busted nose, danced around Thurman like Thurman can't react, countered his jabs with a right hook whilst having the shorter reach and easily knocked down on the first round? Add the fact that Pacquiao took his biggest 1-2, all the while sporting the nickname "One Time", and smiled like it was nothing? Yeah I say that's schooling. The only times Thurman had some showing is when Pacquiao tired. See what happened in round 10 when he composed some stamina and went back at it.
He KO'd David Diaz. He had a draw with Agapito Sanchez after fight was forced to a TD at Round 6 for Sanchez throwing too many low blows and the accidental headbutts.
Spence is a monster. People seem to forget that Spence wanted to OUTBOX Mikey. He could have overpowered him but he wanted to show he could outbox him. Cant see Pac beating Crawford either. Remember Pac is 40 and a 140lb'er.
Split decision boy, I can highlight everything Thurman did to pac also, anyone with two eyes knows that was a close fight, cut the bull****.
