Can I ask - in what way is it enhanced? How does it being in colour make the viewing experience better? I'm not denying it does for a majority of people, because that's attested to - but i'm completely missing it. What is it i'm completely missing?
Sorry I was thinking about the shorter version uploaded a while ago https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/corbett-vs-fitzsimmons-in-color.633875/ Also the fight is still pretty unwatchable for me I sat through the whole thing once and dealt with the bad fps and quality. The color doesn't really help here. I think his efforts would be better suited for high quality black and white fights My opinion remains that Fitz looks like a good puncher and Corbett looks like a discount Tunney
Pretty sure Compton's version is the most 'advanced' you can get. And I posted cause it was interesting. I like d browns vids.
Loads of people like looking at it, no dispute that it's a worthwhile post. I just can't quite figure why people like it so much. Mind you, I wasn't overexcited about the Peter Jackson WW1 project either, and people lost their **** for that.
For some reason people like Corbett Fitzsimmons alot. Got 4 responses basically immediately. Seems to stir discussion. Yet my Jim Driscoll thread...
Heavyweight threads are always gonna be like that bud. I replied to the Driscoll thread for what it's worth, even if I didn't have much to contribute
