Saying 'Floyd beats Lomachenko easy' is the same as saying Hearns beats Floyd easy

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bluebird, Sep 5, 2019.



  1. bluebird

    bluebird Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,621
    2,262
    Apr 17, 2009
    Yes. They have fought in the same weight class. But Loma is absolutely maxed out at 135 lbs and really is a 126 lber. Look how narrow his clavicles are, he has a tiny frame. He is 30 years old and can make 126 lbs.

    Mayweather and Hearns have both fought at 147 lbs, but Floyd was maxed out there and Hearns has all the physical advantages over Floyd and fought as high as Cruiser.

    Skill wise all 4 fighters are comparable. Size dictates the winner in both match ups.
     
    ShovelHook, AdamT, Holler and 11 others like this.
  2. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    121,404
    32,563
    Jun 23, 2005
    Of course which is what I have always said PBF beats Loma because he's too big for him. Hearns beats PBF because he's too big for him as well.
     
    fenoc1, FastSmith7, kirk and 6 others like this.
  3. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,140
    Dec 23, 2013
    I do think Loma vs 130lb FlIVd has a better chance of winning than a 147lb FlIVd vs Hearns but I think FlIVd has better chance than most people think.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  4. PunchersChance.

    PunchersChance. Active Member banned Full Member

    1,050
    1,020
    Nov 30, 2018
    Not really about size, Floyd is just too good.
     
  5. KiwiMan

    KiwiMan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,218
    14,194
    Feb 28, 2016
    I agree with you on both cases. I'd favour Floyd at 135 vs Lomachenko and Hearns at 147 over Floyd, without hesitation.

    But lets not forget they'd all be each other's best opponents, boxing is an unpredictable sport, so anything could happen.
     
    Holler, Greg Price99 and Malph like this.
  6. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,634
    Feb 1, 2007
    Floyd is way bigger even though he fought at 130.

    Loma is Pac's size more or less.

    Would've been fun 15 years ago.
     
  7. Alo2006

    Alo2006 R.I.P Sean Taylor Full Member

    10,017
    1,406
    Jun 28, 2006
    For Mayweather, he always looked good against bigger fighters, where Loma hasn't. Bigger and taller fighters has given Loma problems. Size does't always dictate who wins though.
     
    941Jeremy and Ph33rknot like this.
  8. Kaan

    Kaan Member Full Member

    278
    149
    Oct 17, 2017
    Mayweather really hasn't fought bigger guys as Loma doing.
     
  9. Richmondpete

    Richmondpete Real fighters do road work Full Member

    7,141
    5,004
    Oct 22, 2015
    Lol what? Floyd jumped more weight classes and fought canelo and delahoya
     
  10. tinman

    tinman VIP Member Full Member

    30,568
    23,137
    Feb 25, 2015
    Um........ nah

    Hearns KO Mayweather.

    6 inch height advantage. 8 inch reach advantage. Hearns is faster and punches way harder.

    This can only end in Hearns by KO.
     
    ShovelHook, Holler, Reinhardt and 5 others like this.
  11. Boxcel

    Boxcel Member Full Member

    387
    476
    Jan 31, 2019
    I think Hearns would KO both Pacquiao and Mayweather at 147, just too damn big and physically gifted. It's one thing to be extra long at the lower weight classes, but it's another to also have great power, speed, and skills. Hearns weakness was his chin but neither Pacquiao nor Mayweather have the one punch KO power to capitalize.
     
    Holler, Reinhardt and Ph33rknot like this.
  12. Boxcel

    Boxcel Member Full Member

    387
    476
    Jan 31, 2019
    What do you mean by bigger lol? Can you name a time Floyd fought someone that had a 6 inch reach advantage and a 4 inch height advantage? Only 6 foot plus fighter he ever fought was Tony pep. For people that had reach over him, you have the following choices: DLH at 73 inches, McGregor at 74, Tony pep unknown, Philip Ndou with 1-2 inch reach advantage. Other than Pep who was a no name, he has never had more than a 2 inch reach disadvantage.

    Grand total of 4 fighters with a reach advantage over him out of 50 fights. How many HOF fighters had reach over him? 1 out of 4. Lmao. People need to stop selling the narrative that Mayweather was tiny for the weight class. Light, yes, but not tiny.

    Canelo was marketed as being huge compared to Mayweather only to look shorter with shorter arms.
     
    ShovelHook and kirk like this.
  13. bluebird

    bluebird Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,621
    2,262
    Apr 17, 2009
    Floyd vs Lara would have shown us something and even then, the size difference is smaller than Loma vs 135 lbers.
     
  14. PIPO23

    PIPO23 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,948
    5,146
    May 18, 2006
    Loma and Pacquiao are about the same. It's just Loma lacks that thump in his left straight and seems to have a glass body and chin.Which is not a good thing to have against a Floyd.
     
    Ph33rknot likes this.
  15. 22JM

    22JM Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,452
    3,918
    Sep 10, 2016
    Lol Mayweather was a complete beast at 130 , he had everything power speed defence and was aggressive, cant say the same about the 147 Mayweather
     
    notjustacasual likes this.