Isn't it a bit naive to expect past era fighters to be competitive against modern fighters...?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Oakland Billy Smith, Sep 12, 2019.



  1. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,365
    3,460
    Apr 20, 2010
    OMG... it doesn't get much funnier than this!
     
  2. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,382
    1,457
    Aug 18, 2012
    Anyone who praises a 15 fight untested novice over an ATG like Durán has zero knowledge of this sport. Fanboy stuff void of logic.
     
  3. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,382
    1,457
    Aug 18, 2012
    Do you know how DEADLY Duran was as a lightweight? He could punch all night, extremely quick and had one punch KO power in either fist. All this and he was constantly feinting and slipping blows. Very few lightweights in boxing history could avoid being koed by him at his best.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  4. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,102
    41,928
    Mar 3, 2019
    I meant Viruet, I got my name's mixed. But
    Sorry. Is Loma not a slick southpaw? Was Viruet not a slick southpaw?

    And Leonard > Loma
     
  5. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,382
    1,457
    Aug 18, 2012
    Loma isn’t greater than anybody. He is an untested 14-1 pro. Let him fight 5-6 ATG opponents THEN let’s compare. Right now he is in an infantile stage in comparison.
     
  6. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,040
    4,951
    Mar 26, 2011
    Duran is top 4 at lightweight,imo but he had problems with movers and who moves better than Loma?
    I'd like to see Loma v Garcia then we might begin assessing him.
     
    roughdiamond likes this.
  7. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,112
    7,534
    Aug 15, 2018
    Or Marciano’s stamina or Ali’s footwork. Great examples.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  8. louis54

    louis54 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,187
    1,296
    Mar 20, 2013
    Most of todays amatuers stink
     
  9. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    12,608
    10,372
    Mar 19, 2012
    In his prime Viruet ran from Duran in both fights but still got a beating. Duran didn't have trouble with movers, he cut the ring down and tortured them. Bizzaro fought Duran in a parking lot sized ring, ran for his life and still ended the night flat on his back.
     
  10. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,382
    1,457
    Aug 18, 2012
    ETM is on the money. Neither opponent fought to win. The Bizzaro KO is one of the most brutal ever in my memory.
     
    ETM likes this.
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,172
    34,895
    Apr 27, 2005
    Duran got ko'd once in 119 pro fights and 31 years of pro boxing including 10 different weight divisions. He got ko'd by an ATG who is one of the greatest P4P punchers in history who held all sorts of physical advantages over him. They fought 19 pounds above Duran's peak weight. Lomachenko is 15 fights, 6 years and 3 divisions deep. The divisions can be glazed over quite a bit as he started so late. Granted there's no filler but there's not much quantity yet either.

    Duran did quite ok and so far Loma has barely even sucked the milk. Tho the era is somewhat barren he should might eventually some stiff challenges ahead at some point. It would be brazen to say he will never get ko'd even given the current landscape.
     
  12. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,314
    3,477
    Jun 28, 2009
    Let's not be daft pal. So would Loma if he fought Hearns. And I mean the prime Loma, not the overweight, old-arse Duran who faced Hearns. He'd have been knocked out by Leonard too, instead of producing arguably the greatest performance in the history of the sport to win on points.
     
    roughdiamond and JohnThomas1 like this.
  13. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,314
    3,477
    Jun 28, 2009
    That, son, is a superb post. Post of the week.
     
    roughdiamond likes this.
  14. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,314
    3,477
    Jun 28, 2009
    Agreed. Buchanan had some of the best feet and lateral/peripheral movement in lightweight history and Duran closed the gap on him with frightening speed. And when De Jesus, an excellent infighter, got outfought on the inside, he got on his bike with plenty of finesse but still got cut down late. Bizzarro, Ortiz, Viruet, Fernandez lost widely to Duran. Well, Ortiz was a bit competitive. Granted, other than the Fernandez fight where he was very convincing, Duran coasted against Viruet, Bizzarro and Ortiz and lacked his usual fire a bit. He was transitioning fight by fight from being a pure raw swarmer into a more complete fighter with textbook underpinning and used these fights imo to experiment and try different things when not quite as comfortable as he would be by De Jesus III, Leonard I, Palomino etc. They fought to survive against him and it isn't easy to look good against, especially if you don't feel threatened. Lomachenko is aggressive and not a runner despite his great movement; @roughdiamond described his style very well. He also brought up Marcel, who was also a great mover and smooth defensive fighter even at that young age. That fight was close, though both were young and inexperienced. Marcel still looks terrific though and shortly became one the great fighters to be captured on film.

    Duran's issues with movers and defensive fighters only came when he was older, slower, less determined, less consistent and having lost his footspeed.
     
    ETM, roughdiamond and JohnThomas1 like this.
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,172
    34,895
    Apr 27, 2005
    Even tho you've encompassed it and then some i'll add at higher weights anyway.