Joe Frazier vs Sam Peter

"Tougher"...? Based on what? Peter was stopped more times than frazier and quit on his stool.

 

Emphatically yes! Peter is a slow, ill conditioned, clubber.

 

peter gets mashed inside 2

 

if u pick frazier what made you write that first bit.

 

ngf cfse vb r vv cthvy bj bmg trbtrnjtjy

 

u think the klitchkos were mediocre? ok,bud.

thanks for your input.

 

snverver bnjnr f v bj hkj k ui kl gre g hygjyn uh ffqw vt

 

whats that lassie? You think kovalev was easily smashed by ward and canelo crushed golovkin?. ok.

 

vjvh jlh j om4yj bt 5 t ht u gn er bn

 

i disagree, lomachneko is not crud, but i agree with your point that prime vitali was easily desotryed by worst lewis, true point.

i wonder whats caused all this sudden honesty from you, but keep it up, all good.

 

Peter gets sent to the slaughterhouse via wicked left hook. KO 8 for frazier.

 

Frazier would have handled Peter without too much trouble.

 

It wouldn't be easy but Fraizer likely breaks him down and forces him to quit. Similar to Mathis fight. Peter was big, athletic, and strong, but never really found the right formula for success, he tried slugging, he tried boxing, he tried bobbing and weaving..he just didn't have the brain for this sport. Frazier's relentless pressure and winning strategy would be too much.

 

This would be a mismatch, this time in Frazier's favor. It would be a schooling of biblical proportions. Samuel Peter would have a degree in boxing after the bout