John Mugabi v Stanley Ketchel

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Eye of Timaeus, Sep 25, 2019.



  1. Eye of Timaeus

    Eye of Timaeus Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,893
    1,180
    Sep 1, 2019
    Not really sure about this one. I think I'd favour Ketchel from I what I heard he was a great fighter
     
  2. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,842
    15,169
    Oct 4, 2016
  3. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,538
    14,554
    Dec 20, 2006
    Not sure who Mugabi beat at 160 that would give any indication that he could win this?

    Ketchel by KO 8
     
  4. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member Full Member

    51,883
    64,216
    Aug 21, 2012
    I recall Mugabi wasn't that hard to hit. Maybe I'm somewhat foggy on him. If that was the case, letting Ketchel tee off on you is an awfully bad idea.
     
  5. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    9,600
    17,682
    Jul 25, 2015
  6. Eye of Timaeus

    Eye of Timaeus Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,893
    1,180
    Sep 1, 2019
    hell in a cell 15 rounds
     
  7. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    9,600
    17,682
    Jul 25, 2015
    lol. Ketchel at his peak for me. War.
     
  8. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,652
    5,672
    Jan 22, 2009
    Lol. Nice
     
  9. ray fritz

    ray fritz Active Member Full Member

    767
    268
    Nov 4, 2018
  10. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,382
    1,457
    Aug 18, 2012
    Mugabi hit like a hammer but was a wide open target with questionable durability. Ketchel was a hellacious puncher with exceptional durability and killer instinct. Have to pick Ketchel by KO early.
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    53,956
    32,913
    Feb 11, 2005
    Mugabi in 5.

    No swing from the hip, hophead hayseed is going to take down an immaculate athlete like The Beast.
     
    emallini and Pat M like this.