Go write a boring 5,000 word essay about how I'm wrong. When I've checked out RBR threads your scorecards are terrible, so what would you know?
More than you do shithead. Which is why I can write 5000 word essays, and all you can muster is a few weak paragraphs of delusional hyperventilating embellished distortions of reality.
Another one flashed by elbow and gloves hitting. Again: 1) Knockdown 2) SD was throwing a lot of flashy punches, but when you look closer they hit quite often gloves or elbows and the final picture becomes not so favourable for SD. 3) GGG was hitting SD more often dealing more damage 4) Rozier was telling before last rounds to SD that they were loosing. 5) Stats show that GGG had a slight advantage in number of punches landed 6) GGG took the last rounds How on earth could it be robbery?
You definitely watch more boxing than I do. Do you know more? I'm not the person I'd associate with hyperventilating and getting upset over a forum post.
Well I know enough to not call a 6-6 or 7-5 type match, with about 7 rounds where you can't split the two a robbery. So yeah, I guess I do.
If you think it was a robbery please post your score card of the 7 clear cut rnds that were SD. This was a close fight. I had it 6 rnds a piece with the knock down rnd being the deciding factor. Had the judge giving it to SD there would have been no complaints from me. Close fights are not robbery!! Robbery is when you see score cards of 118 - 110 for either fighter.
I had 114-113 derev but it was a good close fight. If I watch it again I could easily see myself reversing a few rounds and seeing a golovkin win