Azumah Nelson rated No.41 in a list of the best fighters in the last 50 years

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Sep 12, 2018.


  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,531
    May 4, 2017
    (1996) info:
    World Titles: Featherweight, Junior Lightweight
    Quality of competition: 10
    Bouts vs. Top 50 fighters: 3
    Why He`s Here: If his KO over Jeff Fenech didn`t guarantee him a spot in Canastota then his of Gabe Ruelas sure did
    What He Could Have Done To Better His Ranking: He can still do it by winning the lightweight title. (1996) Do you feel Nelson could have beaten some of the lightweight champs down the years? Do you feel he could have beaten De La Hoya when he was the WBO lightweight champ?
     
  2. Bronze Tiger

    Bronze Tiger Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,209
    5,061
    Jun 23, 2018
    This is one guy who never had to be told " just let your hands go "
     
  3. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,684
    33,563
    Jul 4, 2014
    He lost that first fight to Fenech. It has been many years but I don't remember it as even being much close.
     
  4. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,521
    10,707
    Aug 22, 2004
    I had it 9-3 for Fenech, that first fight. Still, Nelson is underplayed a bit here I think. He was a beast at 126, and became more patient and cagier by the time he'd aged into 130. Not entirely sure though, that he merits THIS high a ranking.
     
    Rock0052 likes this.
  5. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,736
    12,862
    Oct 20, 2017
    He was still super feather champ in 1996 after another remarkable comeback victory beating Ruelas the previous year. He hadn't lost to Genaro Hernandez yet. His stock was high.
     
  6. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,099
    5,664
    Feb 26, 2009
    He was a heck of a fighter, and I think he would have been better at 135 had he been a little younger and not lost to Pernell. He was a good puncher.
     
  7. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,521
    10,707
    Aug 22, 2004
    But a more uneven performer at the weight. Not the fault of the 4 pounds , more an age thing. To his credit , he kind of reinvented himself there, conserving energy , setting traps..........before , he'd just walk through you.
     
    Shisha likes this.
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,376
    41,334
    Apr 27, 2005
    Nelson is awesome and underrated on the whole imo.
     
    MURK20, young griffo and ETM like this.
  9. Shisha

    Shisha New Member Full Member

    32
    12
    Mar 23, 2019
    He was a great fighter and could probably beat Sanchez in a rematch at 130.
     
    MURK20 likes this.
  10. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,531
    May 4, 2017
    No Sanchez was more skilled and was improving when tragedy struck.
     
    Somali Sanil likes this.
  11. john roberts

    john roberts Member Full Member

    334
    205
    Sep 5, 2017
    AZUMAH who? (Pat cowdell) LOL one of the funniest things I ever heard.
     
    mark ant likes this.
  12. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,521
    10,707
    Aug 22, 2004
    How do you determine that he was improving?
     
    Shisha likes this.
  13. Somali Sanil

    Somali Sanil Wild Buffalo Man banned Full Member

    6,555
    7,552
    Sep 1, 2019
    Age ?? Surely he was only gonna get better
     
  14. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,531
    May 4, 2017
    He getting better at defending against counter rights which was a weakness he had.
     
  15. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,521
    10,707
    Aug 22, 2004
    Boxing doesn't work like that. He turned pro at 15. That makes 23 not quite 23. We saw the best Sanchez we were going to see.