too late. now youre just that dog who barks with the tail between his legs. we all know what that dog is all about.
If you think that logic dictates the person with whom you have entered into a corrupt arrangement with should be considered trustworthy , you sir, are no longer beneath my contempt.
that dumbass dosnt even realize hes giving you legitimacy. in other words, you are now worthy of his contempt, whereas before, you didnt even rank that high. looks like you are earning his respect. truth is, hes too stupid to understand what hes writing. but im suppose to take an ignorant clown like that seriously, lol?
Look at kovalevs interview after the fight. Is that how you would act if a guy you made an agreement with tried to take your head off and humiliate you? It doesn't take an expert in body language to know when someone's just realized they were just stabbed in the back
In a sport where people routinely die in the ring, 3rd degree can't imagine that a huge Hopkins (who went on to win titles at light-heavy) couldn't KO a faded De La Hoya who lost to Felix Sturm and whose best weight was 135-147. Further absurdity to that theory: De La Hoya is the star, not Hopkins, who once did a 35,000 pay-per-view with Chad Dawson. The notion that there would be any financial incentive whatsoever for De La Hoya to "take a dive" against Bernard Hopkins is patently absurd. He was Koed by a body shot to the kidney. That's actually what happened. The illuminati was not on the scene.
How does the very real danger of potentially killing an opponent in the ring correlate with a fighter Again, be quiet dummy.
