Azumah nelson vs hector camcho

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by expljose, Sep 19, 2019.



  1. expljose

    expljose Active Member Full Member

    1,259
    445
    Nov 6, 2013
    At 130 who wins...go!
     
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    I pick Nelson because Cmacho was so poor v Rosario and Nelson was so much better v Sanchez, no way would Camacho have landed as much on Sanchez as Nelson did he would have been toyed with, Nelson has a far better legacy, Camacho was overrated but he would have given Nelson a lot of problems with his angles.
     
    expljose likes this.
  3. expljose

    expljose Active Member Full Member

    1,259
    445
    Nov 6, 2013
    Yeah i see nelson being too physically strong for him ...camacho was a fast guy but i think his speed gets a bit over rated i dont think it was game changing speed on the main event level ...he blew the doors off 2nd and 3rd level fighters bit when it came time to step up on the main stage it just wasnt enough ....not saying whitikar speed
     
  4. Richard M Murrieta

    Richard M Murrieta Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,503
    28,380
    Jul 16, 2019
    I agree with those assumptions very much, Camacho was not the same after the Rosario fight on June 13 1986. He began the downward slide as we all saw in the Cornelius Boza Edwards fight in Sept 1986, when he became gun shy and ran. Edwards complained about the holding and running during the post fight interview. Azumah would be way too strong for Hector too handle. Hector is not a Salvador Sanchez or a Sweet Pea Whitaker.
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2019
    expljose likes this.
  5. expljose

    expljose Active Member Full Member

    1,259
    445
    Nov 6, 2013
    He tries clinching on zoom zoom hes getting ate up with body shots and uppercuts
     
  6. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,063
    2,149
    Oct 18, 2004
    Hector by Ud, would still win 10 out of 12.