Randolph Turpin v James Toney

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Eye of Timaeus, Dec 11, 2019.



  1. Eye of Timaeus

    Eye of Timaeus Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,893
    1,180
    Sep 1, 2019
    I think Turpin wins this on points. His win against Robinson is better than anything Toney has done. Thoughts?
     
  2. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,102
    41,930
    Mar 3, 2019
    #1. Watch some mu'****ing James Toney. He whoops that ass
    #2 it's foolish to make predictions based on achievements, over styles and skill.
     
    TipNom likes this.
  3. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    12,608
    10,372
    Mar 19, 2012
    Turpin had a very short time at the top. He was fearsome, strong, awkward and he had quick hands. His jab was a huge weapon for him.
    Toney had a much different style than Robinson. Better pocket defense but not anywhere near the footwork or speed of SRR.
    It depends on how Toney deals with the strength and awkwardness of Turpin.
    I would layoff this one.

    Some fighters get ruined by a loss. Especially when it's a devastating KO. I think that was the case with Randy Turpin.
     
  4. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,997
    4,982
    Mar 22, 2015
    Turpin's demise was largely self inflicted.
    Women and booze.
     
  5. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,348
    4,045
    Jul 14, 2009
    I also think Toney wins this. Styles make fights
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  6. thistle

    thistle Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,642
    5,722
    Dec 21, 2016
    Turpin's best performance was a lovely display of boxing against C ockell...

    overall he was a good & capable fighter, lucky and unlucky too. But like a lot of fighters I feel he enjoyed the pleasure of hype, which has carried him to a wrong historic placement.

    it's like achievement wins, you get an automatic high standing, yet there were greater champions who rate less because of less title wins and such. like Boxrec Ratings, it is extremely erroneous that 'recent decade fighters score 'higher' because they might have competed in say a dozen or so title fights in a total of 35 fight careers, where as great past champions who might have only competed in 2 or 3 title fights in a 100 or more fight career score 'lower' in Boxrec's tallying system.

    it is not just questionable, it is completely inaccurate in reality.
    see AJ and Fury for example. their 31 and 33 greatest HW's of Alltime Boxrec Rating wise... how & why and as if.

    they'd be luck to be in the TOP 200 HW's of all time, when you think of the literally hundreds of good & great HWs who have graced boxing rings over 150 years of boxing. Same sort of thing for Turpin.
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2019
  7. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,831
    15,151
    Oct 4, 2016

    Very nice
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  8. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    12,608
    10,372
    Mar 19, 2012
    In Randy Turpin's day there were not multiple titles floating around. No 168lbs division. It was alot different.
     
    Fergy likes this.
  9. Furey

    Furey EST & REG 2009 Full Member

    16,301
    6,159
    Oct 18, 2009
    If you think AJ and Fury would be lucky to get in the Top 200 HW's of all time then your deluded beyond saving and need your head checking.
     
  10. thistle

    thistle Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,642
    5,722
    Dec 21, 2016
    did you Read and Understand my post?

    First Off we need to be very clear here, very clear.

    HW's and Fury, AJ, LL, Klits and ALL of Today's HW's are NOT HW's - they are SUPER-Heavyweights and that is a Different Animal / division, completely different!!!

    so once you divide them, you have 2 Lists - Over 100 years of Heavyweights and approx 35 years of SUPER - Heavyweights.

    so after you list say 110 years of HW Champions and Top Contenders you will get at least 150 names and more counting some worthy on the Fringe guys.

    then you list 35 years of S-HW Champions and Contenders you'd be lucky to List 75 truly Top Class men.

    so I repeat, even if you take the TOP 15-20 S-HW Greats, most of which aren't really greats are they, lets be honest.

    so very few of them would replace the TOP Heavyweights on EVEN Terms on P4P Head to Head Lists, would they.

    remember silly 'points' given on computer systems that DON'T Account for Eras and Number of fights undertaken against True Quality Opposition and such missing factors, Don't Count. ... this method is horribly flawed.

    So I stand by my statement, and there are many Boxing fans, writers, researchers and historians that understand this without having to spell it out!

     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2019
  11. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,366
    3,465
    Apr 20, 2010
    Nowhere in your original post do you say anything about distinguishing between HWs and S-HWs… but here you are, blaming the guy for not being able to read your mind, and understand that this is what you're talking about. What a strange way to behave!
     
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.
  12. thistle

    thistle Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,642
    5,722
    Dec 21, 2016
    Whoa slow down, nobodies blaming anybody. I'm just explaining my post 'IF' it isn't clear enough. Sorry.

    you are right however, in that it isn't an automatic given that they are 2 different divisions, again you are right here. but equally there are a lot of people that do too though.

    so for the benefit of all I have tried to clarify.
     
    Bukkake likes this.
  13. Furey

    Furey EST & REG 2009 Full Member

    16,301
    6,159
    Oct 18, 2009
    Nah your talking completely out your ass bro.
     
    SHADAPBLAD and PhillyPhan69 like this.
  14. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,597
    May 13, 2014
    Toney had comparable handspeed to Robinson. Lead feet though.
     
  15. DavidC77

    DavidC77 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,782
    1,478
    Aug 30, 2018
    I don't think booze was an issue at all.
    He was a compulsive spender and continued spending like there was no tomorrow even when he was heavily in debt.

    His decision to take control of his own affairs after the second Robinson fight was a fatal mistake.
     
    Cecil likes this.