Fury distances himself from a fight with AJ next year!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Dec 16, 2019.



  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    I read an article in my paper today stating how Fury has fired his trainer but the article finished by stating Fury has distanced himself from a possible showdown with AJ next year, why won`t Fury fight AJ?
     
  2. DON1

    DON1 ICEMAN Full Member

    5,111
    1,072
    Apr 6, 2006
    Because he intends on fighting binmen for tons of money until he retires.
     
    mark ant likes this.
  3. speedbaggage

    speedbaggage Member Full Member

    378
    250
    Mar 22, 2014
    He's realised AJ can box a bit and if they fight his normal clowning in the ring isn't going to hide his lack of fundimentals.
     
  4. Safin

    Safin Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,815
    7,768
    Aug 3, 2019
    Tyson Fury has a contract with ESPN whereby he has to fight 3 more times in the United States, which is what he was referring to. In the Michelle Joy Phelps interview from a day or so ago, he stated that it would be Deontay Wilder twice, then another opponent.
     
    LoadedGlove likes this.
  5. northpaw

    northpaw Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,251
    7,839
    Jun 5, 2010
    Joshua will not be fighting the winner of Wilder/Fury very soon no matter what.

    Timeline:
    Fury/Wilder is in February. The winner will have to take on the WBC mandatory or be stripped, no more voluntary defenses

    Joshua has two "2" mandatory defenses: the WBO and IBF, or he will be stripped. I doubt Joshua put in the work to get the belts back to simply lose one of the belts by not taking on a mandatory.

    Given the fact that all respective belts have pushed their mandatory obligations far into the future, we're now at the point where they can't anymore without losing their respective titles.

    Of course all this could be moot and maybe they toss the belts aside to make the biggest fights happen. I doubt that happens though.
     
    Odins beard likes this.
  6. lucky luke

    lucky luke Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,585
    851
    May 18, 2013
    Is "my paper" a paper that exist in the real world?
     
  7. nickpoppunk

    nickpoppunk Unbelievable Bentekkers Full Member

    1,554
    552
    Feb 14, 2012
    he juicing again.
    probably why ben left his ass.
     
  8. fenoc1

    fenoc1 Active Member Full Member

    1,153
    424
    Oct 10, 2009
    haha fundamentals. Fury has the best boxing fundamentals of all active heavyweights
     
  9. TheRevAshton

    TheRevAshton Member Full Member

    381
    528
    Dec 12, 2018
    In terms of Defense, Movement and Distance... yes you're correct.

    But Offensively... No, definitely not.
     
    Jacko likes this.
  10. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    27,351
    11,761
    Dec 6, 2008
    Not really. Fury is unorthodox and awkward. He makes it work. He moves straight back like Ali, which is a no-no. But you can make it work with talent. AJ is more fundamentally sound, even if his defense is worse in the end.
     
    Tramell likes this.
  11. Heisenberg

    Heisenberg Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,990
    5,416
    Apr 30, 2017
    mark ant likes this.
  12. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    The Sun in Britain.
     
  13. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    This content is protected
     
  14. speedbaggage

    speedbaggage Member Full Member

    378
    250
    Mar 22, 2014
    Apart from the punching part. Can't throw a jab and can't throw a right hand. Pretty fundamental part of boxing if you ask me.
     
  15. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    He out-jabbed Wilder and would outjab most fighters based on reach along WTF? are you talking about?
     
    fenoc1 likes this.