Prime Evander Holyfield vs Prime David Tua who wins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by rayhogan, Aug 26, 2009.



  1. Kiwi_in_America

    Kiwi_in_America The Tuaminator Full Member

    4,975
    2,374
    Oct 19, 2006
    Tua needs no steroids to be that big.

    Walk around New Zealand and you'll see dozens of Samoan guys huge like that!!
     
  2. Muhammed_Ali_Durmaz

    Muhammed_Ali_Durmaz Devon 2 banned Full Member

    145
    44
    Dec 18, 2019
  3. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,877
    787
    Nov 23, 2007
    Evander all day,another level
     
  4. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,836
    15,161
    Oct 4, 2016
    Holyfield by a UD, he's more accomplished than Tua and he'd fight the same way he did against George. Could be some rocky moments though.
     
    KiwiMan and Odins beard like this.
  5. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,407
    Jan 10, 2007
  6. Odins beard

    Odins beard Fentanyl is one hell of a drug.... Full Member

    20,458
    12,574
    Apr 13, 2014
    Holyfield wide but competitive UD.

    Holyfield was the better mid/shirt range fighter and would outbox and outwork Tua, although Tua would have his moments being the more powerful fighter, hurting Holyfield at times.
     
    Big Ukrainian likes this.
  7. PH1882

    PH1882 Member Full Member

    145
    99
    Feb 14, 2019
    Holyfield mastered and frustrated Iron Mike so won't be overly concerned about Tua.
     
    reckless likes this.
  8. chico g

    chico g What are you staring at Mr Trump?! hahaha! Full Member

    10,348
    11,138
    Oct 18, 2008
    Prime Holyfield was a level above Tua. Wide UD win.
     
    Big Ukrainian and reckless like this.
  9. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,362
    5,495
    May 2, 2015
    Holy by decision. Though he’d probably have to climb off the canvas once or twice.
     
  10. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,055
    369
    Dec 19, 2009
    They sparred plenty. Tua was no joke... very strong, very durable, and big punching power in both hands. He also had decent hand speed, stamina, and punch output when he was at his best. It would take more than that to beat Holyfield. Holyfield by clear decision but Tua has some good moments.
     
  11. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,055
    369
    Dec 19, 2009
    Tua was down vs. Rahman (as the bell was ringing and it did not count) and Barrett. Tua wasn't seriously hurt vs. anyone though. Holyfield was down vs. Cooper (needed the ropes), Bowe (needed the ropes), Bowe x2 more, Ruiz, and Toney.
     
  12. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,140
    Dec 23, 2013
    This is easy. Holyfield and its problably not even close. Ike fought an absolute prime Tua and beat him with out half the skills EH could bring to the table. Sure Ike was bigger but chin and output is what led him to beat Tua. EH had chin, output and skills in spades.
     
    Big Ukrainian likes this.
  13. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,140
    Dec 23, 2013
    The Tyson Holyfield fought was a poor mans Mike Tyson too lol!
     
  14. fistsof steel

    fistsof steel Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,132
    2,963
    Nov 13, 2010
  15. Entaowed

    Entaowed Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,844
    4,107
    Dec 16, 2012
    Sorry man, this is mostly misguided & wrong.

    1) Some of those men used. Others like Tyson & Tua were big young (Tyson by 13, before lifting, por boxing, & with no access to PEDs nor reason to take them).
    2) Hearns was tall & long, was underweight at WW, & there is no evidence he must have or needed to use them to finally reach 190.
    3) It is unfair & irrational to assume most everyone used.
    Though many dabbled, & some used regularly or many courses over some years.
    4) The health consequences for using steroids & related drugs are extremely well documented.
    SO many of the just body building stars from the 60's & beyond died young or very young.
    Often from heart, kidfney &/or lover problems.
    There can be no ethical double blind studies to determine what levels & endless combinations of PEDs, HgH & potentiators are how dangerous to who.

    If you insist that science reserves judgement upon whether they are dangerous...That radical posotion severely compromises your credibility on the whole subject.

    5) Making you short for your division? That is mistaken on two levels...

    A) If you are strong enough to get a big power, energy & punch resistence advantage, it is so often worth the cheating. And usually is worth being shorter-though there are steroids that maximize strength WITHOUT adding much muscle mass so will not even make you effectively shorter, like Alex Rodrigues took-did you know any of hat that man?
    Though I am deeply against it & how it steals money, glory & success from honest men.

    B) The height & length question does not apply at ALL if you already were fighting at HW like Holyfield & Tua were!

    I hope you can be the fairly rare person who can admit when they are wrong on some demonstrable facts.
     
    Tramell likes this.