No he hasn't. I call a spade a spade. Always have, always will. Boxing is a lot more important to me than Tyson Fury.
The reason you have this odd ‘everyone must have loads of alternative accounts’ conspiracy-type thinking to the ‘anti-Fury brigade’ is because you can’t accept any criticism of him and stratospherically overstate his achievements and ability. Fury’s not a bad boxer by any stretch, but it seems unless you think he’s massively successful, wildly popular, and an all-time great you’re some trolling hater. I’m sorry but the person on here who seems to have the opinion which is furthest from the truth about Fury is clearly you.
Not quite sure your point? I was just responding to your comment. If it was meant to be an ironic joke about PPV then you've had a bit of a whoosh moment haven't you. Sorry to see it's not quite racking up the likes you'd hoped it would when you deemed it funny enough to post?
I don’t think you know what that means. I’ve been perfectly reasonable about Fury. I’m perfectly happy to accept he’s a top three heavyweight, that the Klitschko win was tactically excellent and that he truly deserved the win and so on. However, what started with me saying something along the lines of ‘I found that fight really boring’ has become ‘you’re obviously a paid Matchroom shill because who on earth would suggest they found Fury boring and overrated.’ It’s farcical. Tyson isn’t just a good defensive heavyweight with one great win on his record but several questions still to be answered. He’s a literally unhittable internationally mega-popular people’s and lineal champion who is better than a prime Lennox Lewis. That’s not a debate - it’s just fanboy drivel.
It’s because you post on most threads about Fury in a negative way and also manage to bring him into threads he’s not part of. Are you supporting him this weekend?
Number of threads I’ve created about Tyson Fury? None. I’d also be very surprised if you could find any evidence of me bringing him into a thread without relevance. This weekend I want Wilder to win. I think that’s the best result for boxing and allows the possibility of a Joshua Wilder fight to remain. I think if Fury wins then Joshua Wilder is less likely to happen. I think Joshua Fury happens at some point regardless.
You are exactly the same when it comes to Hearn and Matchroom hence why I said pot and kettle. You are both exactly the same just from different sides. I think you would probably find the two of you have alot in common outside of boxing opinion.
Go on lad! I'm neutral in the fight to be honest. I just hope we get a decent scrap as the world is watching.
Though he does still hate on BJS post signing for Matchroom. My view on Tonyhayers has softened of late. He’s not actually saying anything outlandish these days. It’s reasonable and justifiable. He just doesn’t rate Fury or BJS as highly as others, which is fair enough. I rate both but the fact is both have thin resumes and some dodgy performances against no marks, BJS especially. Fury made me laugh saying he can sell a million ppvs fighting a bum back home. Thought of tonyhayers immediately
