He prob fills in a little scorecard at the end of each thread he fills with his crap that says he won whatever argument over Canelo he was having. Obviously everyone else can see what actually went down but he has little set of obviously wrong scorecards to hang on to and that gets him through the day.
How nice, not only do you need to play pretend, and seek validation from other insecure betas, but you don't have the balls to quote my entire response and engage in a real debate with me. What a little fruit. Hurry and call your gggirls for backup. Lol
What? The four rounds aren't difficult to score except maybe the first round. Round 2 was clearly Pirog. 3 and 4 were Jacobs and round one was probably Jacobs too, but won't argue if you gave it to Pirog. You gggirls have some real issues dealing with reality lol.
No, it's not. No one has once mentioned Canelo's corruption so far. Or the GGG fights... Its a genuine question, which you're throwing your toys out the pram over. You might not be starting Canelo threads, but you lose your **** over them. It's actually quite pathetic. Also, you clearly do seek validation for your feelings, or you wouldn't have put your avatar as Pacquiao on his ass. How nice, you pull me up for joke, then call me a "fruit". **** insult pal, have a word. You're scoring skills are shocking. Jacobs wasn't deservedly up, he won one round before getting starched.
The gggirls: GGG was robbed in both fights Abel Sanchez: Canelo deserved the win Lol... how's that for reality? And does my avatar trigger you? Lmao!! That was one of the sweetest moments in boxing HISTORY. Here you have a cash cow in Pacquiao clearly losing twice arguably three times to the underdog and much less famous nemesis, only for Bob Arum to say to him, sorry Bud, that's business destroy the media darling and cash cow... and no, unlike Abel Sanchez I don't think I heard Berenstain say Pac deserved the victory against JMM. And last, as far as the Jacobs-Pirog fight, I hope you don't agree with the moron who said Pirog dominated Jacobs the entire 5 rounds. Pirog had a total of ONE dominant round excluding round 5.
80% of people who saw the fight are gggirls apparently which is weird considering Canelo is the one with the bigger fanbase by far... As for Canelovers suddenly loving Abel Sanchez well that's hilarious in itself. It's weirdos like you Isal who can't accept that your guy didn't deserve a draw and a win and everybody knows it. It's why you sullied a Pirog Canelo thread with more Golovkin Canelo talk. You can't handle it. Now get the **** back on topic or run away from this thread and bump an actual Golovkin Canelo one if that's what you're so desperate to talk about.
There you go with that 80% lol. Do you really think 80% of forum members know how to score using the 10 pt. must system, let alone 80% of casuals? Look, I've got Abel Sanchez, Roberto Duran, George Foreman, and Mike Tyson agreeing with me. You know that 80% of the ring side press had Mosley beating DLH in the rematch? Lol.. yup... the ring side press mostly consists of unpaid journalists who don't cut it for the mainstream.
Bump a Canelo Golovkin thread and you'll get a response from me on this. Copy and paste the above if you like. Hell go nuts and tag me in it. You're attempting to derail another thread about the stylistic match up between Pirog and Canelo. Contribute to this or move the **** on.
Nah boss. Now try again. Do you want to talk about Pirog as a stylistic match up for Canelo or perhaps write something remotely amusing? I think you can do it if you set your mind to it. I think a good case for Canelo winning this match up can be made. Go for it it. Believe in yourself as much as you do Saul.