Eddie Reynoso says BJS VS CANELO may 2nd

Also in what ****ing way is picking a 1/3 favourite ever considered going against the grain? And I'm the deluded one. This guy's a character man. I should leave him alone as it's starting to feel mean but he just keeps throwing them up whilst I'm at bat and learns nothing from each time a post has been swatted out of the park.

 

He is free to pull out the bet anytime, neither one of us knew what the odds would be, fight hasn’t even been announced. If I don’t bet on fights, why does your mind arrange facts to make me out as some hustler looking to scam? Anyone reading probably understands why, I’m just curious if you’re aware of who you really are.

 

Perhaps you were naive enough to think the betting lines would be more even. You looking double down pretty quick doesn't look great though.

It'd be funny if you - as one of our resident know-it-all's - were that wet behind the ears. Although you did saying you were going against the grain by picking Canelo in this thread so maybe you are being genuine. In which case you must be pretty red faced right about now to find out you're not going against the grain at all.

 

Sweet. Props to Canelo. Some of his fights may have very questionable decisions, but you can't say he's spending his prime feasting on complete bums like a lot of other fighters do.

 

I knew as much about the fight as the guy asking ME for a bet. A bet I told him was throwing away money, yet he agreed anyway. Somehow me telling him it’s a bad bet constitutes a scam in your broken mind.
Go have a talk with yourself, get to know the real you.

 

Look man, you've made a few ricks in this thread and I want to help you out here. Your confrontational style, much like a certain Mr. Wilder's invites challenge and having seen the betting and analysis posts I couldn't resist calling you out on the stupidity of both.

We all get picks wrong and if you genuinely didn't know that the odds were going to be heavily stacked in your favour win you accepted and then tried to double down it makes you a better if a little dumber person than I realised.

Good luck, as much as you've deserved my responses recently I don't need to kick a man when he's down. Take this humbling and learn from it.

 

Lmao! The delusions are real. What more is there to say? It’s pretty obvious how deluded your logic and ability to accurately process information is, so it’s a great indicator of how accurate all your other assessments are, about yourself and everyone else. No mysteries here.

 

Lol...BJS, get the **** outta here.

 

There's not much to say here other than you're projecting. I hope you find the strength to drop the tough guy image you've tried to cultivate for yourself and realise it's fine to be wrong sometimes.

It's only boxing and saying you'll eventually be wrong after getting the biggest fight of the year thus far completely wrong only a week ago is a little sad to read. Perhaps you had walked over to your computer with too heavy a costume on when you made that trademark big bandeedo pick. Who knows but you?

Oh and don't try to make bets for even money in which the odds are pretty one sided one way. If you were being genuine earlier then be careful as it could be you getting stung by some chancer next time out.

 

Didn’t realize I had a tough guy image, but I’ve tested my mettle enough to know where I stand. I ain’t the toughest here, and I’ve acknowledged as much, but I sure as heck ain’t soft. I also know that the vast majority on here have never even seen real violence, much less been a part of it. So you can talk all day about what you would do, till you actually have to do it, then you can really know who you really are. And I ain’t talking bout schoolyard slap fights, I’m talking true destructive violence. I know what my grade is on those tests so I ain’t easily impressed. Maybe that’s why guys like you make me laugh when they talk toughness.

 

Personally you have more faith in Saunders than me, never really thought much of him for me you have to fight the fights and he's pretty much no different than the rest grab a vacant title and hold it hostage til they get picked.

Personally outside of height I'd give Canelo every other advantage as a boxers I'd take the guy who was competed and held his own vs guys like GGG, Lara, Cotto then the guy who looks great vs Lemieux and Lee. Speed I'd say is about even again level of comp matter guys like Trout,Lara, Jacob's weren't really faster than Canelo so I don't think Saunders speed will be an issue power shouldn't be a question I know everyone has off nights but Canelo seems like one of the few guys in this generation that is actually dedicated to the sport and wants to be great.
I personally don't see how he wins but I do know he's hyped by some and is technically a 2 weight Champ which based of his resume is embarrassing but it is what it is.
Personally as a fan I wanted a Benevediaz or Saunders fight for May at 168 for a title based of all 3 fights last fights I'd pick Canelo to beat both in a easy unification

 

BJS has solid boxing skills. If this indeed has been made then it will be interesting to watch.

 

but Khan was alot smaller man

 

Yes, if he would have said bjs is bigger, I would have said “ so was kovalev”. But he said he’s faster, so I said what I said.
My purpose was to illustrate how inconsequential the statement was by itself. Neither one of our statements meant anything, but that’s the level the debate was started at. If I had gotten in depth analysis, I would have countered with the same. I’m perfectly capable of it.