JMM KO'ing Pacquiao is also on that short list, for sure. But as you point out what happened afterward, Pac literally lost the next fight out. While nobody scored it for Bradley and history will remember that, anyone with credentials or eyes had him decisively losing to JMM a year before and history will also remember that. Removes quite a bit of shine as opposed to "KO'ing a legend that was P4P top two." You do realize there is a 6 year gap between Canelo/Floyd and Canelo/Kovalev, right? And you do realize that Canelo is 5'8"? You are only bolstering the case! Thanks.
Fade Faded is what he was against McGregor, you don't beat Pacquiao and Canelo when your faded , no matter how many weight divisions he went up. Quit making sh#* up. Now you log off.
He was still past his prime in both fights. Mayweather from 2013 wasn't the same fighter that he was in 2007.
So was he prime? No he wasn't dumbass no fighter at 36 is prime. PBF at 36 could not move the way he could at 33 he didn't have the bounce in his legs his countering was not as good at 36 as it was at 32 you're a ****ing fool casual who thinks PBF was prime for his whole career. Log off dumbass.
Not really I had it a draw like the 1 judge who got it right and got killed for her score 'she retired. I didn't see any schooling like everyone says, I saw boring chess match which draw was the fair score.
Holy ****. How are people arguing that Mayweather at 152, 36 years of age and having like 45, 20 or so being title fights is prime? Mayweather's best was, and always was, below 147. It's not even up for debate.
