If you consider Helenius TKO4 Kownacki a massive upset... don't.

Povetkin vs. Takam was great. Don't think there's been many if any HW fights better since.

 

Don’t twist the facts. McCline went the distance with Valuev, Peter, and Ruiz before Arreola ended him in four rounds. Whatever happened after that in his career doesn’t matter.

Takam was almost 40 and was never a real contender. He never beat anyone. McCline did.

 

Kownacki's hype was all people looking to give PBC/Wilder/Haymon a boost. People genuinely believed Helenius was great. He wasn't.

 

Breazeale - Ugonoh is up there too.

 

What should embarrass you is that some guy who is perma-fringe gets regarded like Ray Mercer or someone similar only because he’s from the UK. You’d be calling him an ATG if he’d beaten Herbie Hide.

 

Arreola Kownacki too.

 

Except no-none is talking about him like that. He's being compared to Chris ****ing Arreola and you can't stop the circus music whirring around your brain for long enough to think that's legitimate because of your inherent biases.

 

Giving Arreola credit for beating what clearly was a spent Mccline (who shortly later lost to a very poor journeyman with a losing record) would be on par with considering Rahman as one Povetkins best wins which no one does as he was clearly completely past it.

 

He knows he's made a series of stupid comments here but he's too stubborn to stop digging this hole he's found himself in.

 

Banks, Klitschko's coach destroyed that bum as well.

 

Not true, Valuev ended Mcline early, but the rest is correct.

 

Takam has a series of good performances against top tier fighters on a strong resume. It's not like Ortiz had much better than that and people acted like he was this amazing scalp for Deontay despite his age and lack of signature win.

 

But why does No Mark have to be so utterly dishonest with himself in his assessments? It's a bad look for him to start bringing up Seth Mitchell like that is any way going to help his little cause here.