Whichever belt is accompanied by the Ring belt is #1. Ring on its own does not carry the most prestige. 1. WBA (oldest / longest lineage) 2. WBC 3. IBF 4. WBO
How WBA with its super, regular, interim, in recess and gold "world titles" is any better than WBO? Can you explain please? In fact, even some sh1tty organizations like GBO or GBU ar far more legit than WBA with its countless "WORLD" titles.
LOL, WBA is BY FAR the worse of all them with its super, regular, interim, in recess and gold "world" titles
WBA and WBC both have serious management problems but that doesn't change the fact that they are still #2 and #1 respectively. No competition there. If you consider GBO or GBU more legit than WBA, I don't know what to tell you.
Both WBA and WBC are equally corrupt, but they both have the most history and are the most prestigious out of any world title in boxing. The Ring belt is more of a trophy, although significant when combined with another belt, it's meaningless on its own just like the invisible lineal title. In terms of overall prestige it goes WBA Super World Champion WBC World Champion IBF World Champion WBO World Champion WBA Regular Champion WBC Interim title WBO Interim title IBF Interim title WBA Interim title IBO Champion European Title British/Commonwealth Title Japanese Title NABF Title
Please tell me how organization that has 3-4 "world champion" in 1 weight class can be considered as a legit one?
#1. UFC - Best fight the best. #2. IBO - Computerized rankings, best at least ranked vs best. The rest are criminal organizations pretending to be involved in boxing for tax fraud purposes.
