Fact: none of them will ever come any closer to my aptitude for scoring fights than you or I realistically could to matching their ledgers as prizefighters. Fact: your credibility when discussing anything to do with Canelo is...n't. There's nothing to write after "is", because what's listed prior to "is" doesn't exist.
Have they, though? You're just spouting shit off with complete confidence but not much clue there, buddy - walking without a net on a hundred story tightrope. Their complete judging records are publicly available. Feldman: 1,084 bouts judged. Moretti: 1,195 bouts judged. Weisfeld: 1,993 bouts judged. 4,272 combined. I think we determined recently that I'm up into quintuple digits at least by now. Double the lot combined, then. If you're going to insinuate yourself into a conversation to try and dunk on someone or further your forsworn "side's" agenda, make sure what you're saying is true (or if not true, at least not easily fact-checked and refuted ). Come correct.
Judges have more credibility than you, and that's taking into consideration the blatant corruption through the years. You see, you have nothing to lose because you have nothing. Judges have a lot more to lose. So if I can't trust a judge, why should I trust a biased fan. In the case of Caneloggg2, I tend to side with the Golovkin approved judges, the ATG fighters who have no stake on this fight, and Abel Sanchez who he himself said Canelo deserved the victory.
I seriously do not understand why you're not making boat loads of money with your comedy. That's freaking hilarious!! Do you write your own stuff? Serious question.
"Secuno ese ma fortuna la luna locche te amo maria augusto burro la coma eena mi aira se siete. Con carne cheetlana kenna burrella inserte uno falcono messersticko grande wellivere. Manual de usuario en español para el Samsungo Galaxia ES II." ~ODLH
Don't know where you can come out and say that even though you might think Golovkin the winner. For all the media people that scored for Golovkin a great percentage of those were willing to admit that Canelo landed the harder/cleaner punches in both fights. Don't know how you feel about that, but I would say that given that so many who scored for Golovkin feel that way, off of that how can you come to the assumption that where isn't any other reasonable outcome other than a Golovkin victory. That just doesn't fly.
...because boxing is scored on a RBR basis and not by tallying up punches thrown or landed (and you know this). And in both fights there are sufficient clear Golovkin rounds to mathematically exclude the possibility of Canelo winning either one.
Something weird is going on with revisionism and the second fight. At the time something like 90% of people surveyed thought GGG had won. It was a scandal, he got robbed again and this time didn’t even get the draw. These days whenever it gets brought up a majority of the comments support either ‘Canelo won’ or ‘too close to call’. Yet look at the poll- GGG smashing it again. For whatever reason there just seems to be a very loud minority pushing the narrative that GGG didn’t win.
GGGs efforts in the 2nd fight were definitely strong enough to earn him the win, the biggest Canelo fans can’t even discredit that. Fact of the matter is that we as GGG fans can’t give him the win neither can a poll. However more Canelo fans are now starting to realize it was a very close fight and just because GGGs face looked worse he did not get beat down. He was the fresher of the two fighters at the bell, could have went 3 more rounds.
