Dumb aze You quote my response to YOU and call YOURSELF an ALT WTF—-How young and stupid one has to be
Who gives af about your little sayings, you little twat? You’re a mouthy little **** who never has anything worth reading outside what you’d expect from a mouthy kid on his mom’s computer. Ydksab, yet have an opinion on everything you know jack **** about. You’re an ass clown.
well, I can only speak on what I witnessed I scored the 1st fight for GGG on the criteria of effective aggression. Triple GGG made the fight by coming forward & effectively landing more shots. In fight 2, I scored it for Canelo again on the same criteria: effective aggression with canelo landing the cleaner harder shots , only this time canelo was making the fight. As I stated earlier I never witnessed GGG backed up & forced to fight off the back foot. He did a good job of it. But It ultimately cost him the fight In my eyes & obviously in the fight of the judges. In fight 3 Golovkin knows the criteria: Shouldn’t be a problem for him to go toe to toe, head to head. Not back down & impose his will in true “Mexican style”... you know be himself. Shouldn’t be a problem for him. It never was before.
Now now, self proclaimed *******, calm down ,its only an internet forum, not real life...well it maybe for you lonley toad Strange guy, didn't like my saying but reposts it lol moron Without sounding harsh, but you may have unknown underlying health conditions.
I had GGG winning by a couple rounds and I was madly supporting him. It wasn't the worst decision I've seen. Tbh I'm kinda scared to rewatch it in case I find more reasons to give it Canelo. GGG definitely won the 1st fight though, no question.
Lol, the importance you place on yourself is hilarious. You’re a dumbass with a computer, how much do you really think that affects me?
Thats some irony coming from the BB's meglamania egotist such as yourself....Judging by some of your past diatribe nonsensensical & fantasist posts, you'd have thought that you had given Manny Stewart advice ...ha ha ha Dreamer
I just watched the second fight for the second time ever and GGG won more clearly than I remembered. Canelo got massive praise for coming forward but he actually probably did a lot LESS than you remember. GGG threw a tonne of punches.
I've been conversing with a burlesque dancer from Guadalajara for a number of years now and her brother Felipe is not only also a huge fan of boxing but he was actually a pretty decent amateur in his day. Anyway, according to his sister he told her that even most Mexican fans had GGG winning both fights and that the minority who scored it the other way mostly comprised of doe-eyed teenybopper casuals.
Where exactly you see the so call "effective aggression" from Canelo, pls explain it to me ? He didn`t even for once was effectively aggressive. He didn`t put GGG not once to the rope, he couldn`t pressure him and send him in a deaf defense, exactly what GGG was doing to Canelo in the first fight. He couldn`t impose his will on GGG. What he did was trying to fight on the front foot, but he was countered all night. If you are the effective aggressive fighter that mean to throw more and land more than your opponent, but this was not the case. GGG was blocking most of Canelo shot and shown incredible good defence and counter his **** all night. Something which Canelo couln`t do at the first fight. And even when Canelo was on the so call "front foot" he find himself at the ropes in some occasion and was in a deaf defense. What effective aggressive mean is what GGG usually do to his opponents. He fight the first fight aggressive and won it clearly and they robbed him, so he knows that if he was to repeat the same tactic he would have robbed him again. He tried different tactic to let Canelo come at him, in order for him to land more cleanly and he definitely did that. Not for once GGG was in trouble at the second fight, so explain me where in the blue hell did you see this effective aggressive? Because if you use some terms, at least know what they mean lol. Golovkin clearly won the first fight, because of his style and pressure. He won the second fight by outboxing and outlanding Canelo simple as that. No way Canelo won more than 4 rounds in the second fight. Canelo is golden boy and he get gift decision so and then. He should have at least 4 loses in his record. He does not belong at top 10 p2p. He is there, because of clearly corruption. And everyone who`s not seeing this is what is wrong with boxing.
I think the answer to this question is "The Fans". I can't recall a judging decision be so hotly debated over such a long period of time. There is such passion from each fanbase, I think this goes to show how big each match was and how the winners were the fans. For these matches to be endlessly debated on here on such a regular basis speaks volumes about how fierce of a rivalry this is amongst fans. So who really won the rematch was the fans, because of how the Canelo GGG matches remain pretty much the most debated boxing matches on this forum and on many forums. The fans of both sides are just addicted to talking about their view of what happened and giving their reasons. There seems to be no end in sight to topics about how each match was or should be scored.