Most talented 1980's underachiever heavyweight

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dmt, Apr 2, 2020.



  1. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,642
    24,800
    Jul 4, 2014
    Fair points. I pick Spoon because had he held onto his belt in a very winnable fight with Smith (whom he had beaten before) he would have went on to face a very inexperienced Mike Tyson. Just being in the fight would have been a hell of an achievement, and he sure as hell would have done better than Smith or Berbick.
     
    lloydturnip likes this.
  2. Sting like a bean

    Sting like a bean Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,047
    1,582
    Apr 9, 2017
    Watching Bowe vs Tubbs right now. I've seen it once years ago, but so far (opening round five) it looks more one-sided for Bowe than I remember. Some great counters by Tubbs though, especially a deft pull followed by a fast double hook to the ribs and head. (Looked like it bounced off the crown.)
     
    Big Ukrainian and lloydturnip like this.
  3. AwardedSteak863

    AwardedSteak863 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,890
    8,562
    Aug 16, 2018
    Tubbs was super talented. Just couldn't or wouldn't get out of his own way.
     
    lloydturnip likes this.
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,266
    35,060
    Apr 27, 2005
    Certainly agree with Page. Other Heavies of the time acknowledged he was the best of the brood but they also knew he had dedication issues. At his best he had a fast hard accurate jab, a right hand not far behind Coetzee's, great reflexes and a great chin for a time. His combination of speed and power was extremely impressive.

    The trouble was he never had the dedication and desire to take advantage of his gifts. He had trust issues and was seldom in shape. By the time he dedicated latter career it was too late.

    Early career he looked like a sure thing against the likes of Ward, Monroe and Evangelista. The trouble was he didn't really improve and develop. He was as good then as he ever was. He did put in a fantastic performance against Snipes and thumped Coetzee with sheer power and durability. Holmes himself said he had to get serious and get off his toes and get those hands up a bit more. He lacked some of the basics is what Larry was hinting at. You can only get so far with natural talent, particularly when you are seldom in shape.
     
    LoadedGlove, Titan1 and lloydturnip like this.
  5. Rope-a-Dope

    Rope-a-Dope Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,138
    7,900
    Jan 20, 2015
    So many to choose from. Probably Page.
     
  6. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,106
    2,459
    Feb 17, 2008
    Thought about it some more====changed my opinion of Bruno. I think the guy that fits the bill is Buster Douglas. Polish that diamond a little with some better tutelage, and he's a pretty good fighter.

    The biggest difference being the time frame he came up in. He would have done much better coming out of that 76-78 era like the others mentioned. Coming along as an up and comer during that Tyson reign is a whole different ballgame than 80-85 era of multiple belt title opportunities.
     
    ideafix12 and George Crowcroft like this.
  7. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,102
    41,931
    Mar 3, 2019
    Buster Douglas is definitely my pick. Imagine him showing up in Tokyo form for every fight?

    Yes - I know that fight was in the 90s, but Douglas was primarily an 80s HW.
     
  8. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,407
    Jan 10, 2007
    I definitely agree. Douglas was incredible talent. He was big HW (not as big as Lewis, Bowe or Wlad but still big) with quick hands and feet, had great footwork, threw great combinations, had good power in both hands, good work rate and very hight boxing IQ. The thing I liked the most about Douglas was the way he threw his beautiful combinations. Not only in Tyson fight - he also threw them in the Mike Williams fight. He did the things that none of the best HWs of the last 30 years could do - ended his combos with huge power punches from another stance (streight left hand).

    He wasn't the most durable but his biggest weakness was a lack of dedication. It's really bad when very talented guys like Douglas, Sanders, Witherspoon or even Bowe couldn't fulfill their potential because of lack of dedication. I mean, at their best nights they looked like they had ATG potential, and all of them were clearly more gifted physically than Evander Holyfield. But Holyfield achieved much more because he was dedicated to boxing.
     
    George Crowcroft, lloydturnip and dmt like this.
  9. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    6,419
    7,022
    Jul 2, 2006
    Good post. However, I am not sure if Briggs was as talented as Witherspoon or Page. Not every amateur champ has the power to succeed in the pros.

    Briggs seemed to lack power compared to some of the other guys.
     
    Titan1 likes this.
  10. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,021
    13,085
    Apr 26, 2006
    This content is protected
     
  11. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,278
    16,004
    Jun 25, 2014
    OMG that woman.

    This content is protected
     
    heerko koois likes this.
  12. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker Full Member

    24,296
    7,661
    Jul 15, 2008
    Witherspoon was the best of the three followed by Page but all three were capable of big performances when motivated .. however all three lacked the mental strength of Holmes who kept it together under the worst of circumstances ..
     
  13. Bonecrusher

    Bonecrusher Lineal Champion Full Member

    3,375
    1,021
    Jul 19, 2004
    Probably Page, although Tubbs was definitely a smooth operator I can only imagine how Smooth he could’ve been if he would’ve been in great shape more often. I loved watching old fat Tony still schooling young guys in the 90’s, if you didn’t catch him and take him out he was probably going to box circles around you. So slick and Fast.

    Michael Spinks when talking about sparring with heavyweights. Said he did very well with Tex Cobb and he even said Cobb said that he buckled him a little bit with a right hand. He also said he handled himself well in the ring against Witherspoon. But he was very definitive in saying he couldn’t do much against Greg Page. He said Page hit the hardest (harder than Spoon) so he spoke highly of Page over Spoon. I think he may have been a light heavy still when he sparred these guys.

    For me I think the answer is Page, probably followed by Tubbs. It’s hard to say that they really underachieved they all held a version of the belt at one point and Witherspoon held it twice. They all had moments where they shined even if it was usually brief.
     
    lloydturnip likes this.
  14. Boxing2019

    Boxing2019 If you want peace, prepare war. Full Member

    6,358
    4,946
    Jul 22, 2019
  15. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,417
    20,246
    Jun 26, 2009
    I’ll throw Jimmy Clark into the mix. He’s a generation behind the others, basically, would have been part of the 1980 team had the U.S. not boycotted the Olympics in Russia. And he was supposed to be on the plane with the USA team going to Poland that crashed, killing off a generation of prospects, but missed the trip after breaking his nose in a car wreck, IIRC.

    Clark lost three times to Teofilo Stevenson in the amateurs, once on a 2-1 decision at the World Championships and later in North Carolina on a highly-disputed decision. Was featured on national TV several times as an amateur and considered the top American heavyweight of his class.

    He went 18-1 as a pro. Lost to Reggie Gross, a journeyman (I think 15-3 at the time but had lost 3 of his last 4) and never beat anyone of note — had three more fights after that (one a no contest vs. Kimmuel Odom), never won a title of any sort, never did anything really.

    Not sure he was on par with Biggs or Page or Tubbs as a prospect, but he achieved so far less than them you could consider him to be the greatest underachiever — at least those guys all beat someone you’ve heard of and become contenders. Not Clark.

    EDIT: Should have said ‘a generation ahead’ of the others in that he a top amateur in latter part of the 1970s and turned pro in January 1981 and hung ‘em up in ‘89.
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2020