Manny Pacquiao Names His 4 Toughest Opponents...

Ohhhhhhhhhh…… yea man he was fresh off knocking out Yarde just in time before he himself got knocked out.

The legendary, all time great Yarde. Can't make this up man.

 

Isal is a troll, don't feed the trolls.

 

Like I said, you won't dare debate that because I'll make you look like the clown you are.

And again, you guys play this stupid loser game accusing people of things to avoid a debate. Instead point out EXACTLY what I'm inconsistent about. That I don't consider Pac a Jr.MW champion? I don't And if you're consistent you DO NOT EITHER.

Instead of getting salty prove me wrong.

 

So he had a close call against a contender.... What's your point? How long have you watched boxing? Do you need a list of Champions having close calls, or actually losing and getting KTFO by contenders? Do you need a list of ATGs, Champions, and top fighters fighting within 1-3 months of their last fights?

What are you looking for son? I can help.

 

Nah. Neither did ****, Floyd just a landed a few more punches every round. Little pot shots here and there that did 0 damage then run all night. Not impressed. Floyd was TERRIFIED of Pac in there, a much smaller guy.

 

I'm a troll because I don't agree with your point of view? Can you be any more haughty?

Like I keep telling you all, you attack me as a person because you can't form a good rebuttal to counter my post.

You guys are from that "Everyone gets a trophy generation" aren't you? Mommy said your handsome, and you're always right too. lol

 

Debate you... you don't debate cuck.... You WILLFULLY LIE to posters you are debating with. And you even admitted to it loser....

 

Again, you accuse me of something but do not back it up with anything, and you're also clearly swerving responding to my points about Margarito and Kovalev comparison. Are you here to be obnoxious and spam the board with non-boxing related crap or talk boxing?

 

Says Marg was shot but he was 2 fights removed from destroying Cotto and performed the same as always. Marg looked the same as he did vs Cotto in both fights. It was Pac who made him shot, destroying his eye. Cotto just didn't have the speed and stamina to finish the job properly.

Meanwhile, Kovalev looked like absolute **** against Canelo. Not close to his usual self, throwing pitty patter jabs all night. And I praised Canelo for taking that fight and thought he was going to lose. The public opinion on DLH vs Pac heavily favored DLH, but sensible people will realize DLH's performance was pretty shitty. You know he gives 0 credit to Pac for that.

 

Can’t argue with that but Red is not going to be light years beyond the Fab 3 of Mexico. Your logic is clouded by your emotional connections

 

I feel that he has surpassed those 3 already. He may not surpass jcc or Sanchez but his career is better than mab em and jmm right now and he will get close to jcc and Sanchez and may surpass them as well. There's not a boxer 168 and down who will be favored over him he has a great chin to you're not knocking him out and he has excellent boxing ability to win decisions. Canelo is extremely hard to beat now or 4 years from now. By then he will have racked up another 10 wins or so and no losses, with that record he will go down as the greatest mexican fighter ever. So just sit back and enjoy the ride.

 

Margarito was past his prime, he took a huge beating against Cotto in both fights despite winning one, and he also took a brutal severe one sided ass kicking against Mosley. Knowing that, what are you saying that Maragrito was prime? Or are you arguing that he was in a better state than Kovalev? Which one?

I thought Kovalev looked fantastic against Canelo.

Is the following true? Kovalev really didn't absorb much punishment. He kept Canelo at bay with his jab throughout much of the fight, and he was fighting on even terms with Canelo. Yes, it is true.

Now I'm not saying Kovalev was prime, I'm saying he was not shot or done like you seem to be suggesting.

One thing you're not mentioning that doesn't help your argument is that many fighters have fought on the side of caution against Canelo, including fighters like Golovkin who went from a seek and destroy fighter to fighting almost exclusively behind the jab very much like Kovalev did. Fighters like Cotto who is known for their body attack, sitting down on his punches and for his pressure, who instead settled to box on his toes and throw mostly arm punches with nothing behind them. You can also include Lara who despite being a defensive fighter, he had never and since the Canelo fight has never used his legs as much as he did in that fight.

So its no surprise that Kovalev decided to fight more cautiously and less aggressive. And another thing you left out was that before the fight they had already said that Kovalev was going to box Canelo instead of using his aggressive style.

So nice try, too bad you didn't have the guts to quote me with this rebuttal, but nevertheless, here you go.. Do you agree with what I said, and if you don't where am I wrong?

 

Nah. He's worse than all of them. He fails to get the job done emphatically in almost all his big name wins. They are always controversial or razor close. I thought he was boxing beautifully vs Jacobs, but he failed to win emphatically again as Jacobs evened up the fight.

 

I edited my previous post re-read it.