Yes people love getting carried away with stuff like this. Hed most likely lose to every active pro boxer unless they were paid to lose.
We all know that, but he’d KTFO of John Fury. His timing looked slightly off and he was also wide open when singing in those left hooks to the body.
What's that supposed to prove? We all know John Fury wasn't a great boxer, I reckon hed do Tyson on the cobbles though
I don’t really know why I’m getting involved in this thread. But the point is it’s ridiculous for John Fury to claim to be the fittest and toughest 50 something.
So he wasn't a great boxer but hed beat one of the best heavyweight boxers ever if the fight was on concrete?
On the cobbles = no rules. If Mike Tyson can't see, then I doubt he'd be tagging Big John Fury with much. It would be like Michael Myers near the end of Halloween II (1981) swinging away at thin air.
Tyson isn't a great boxer anymore, he's an old man **** to bits, and on the cobbles is big John's specialty, no rules, straight savagery, Tyson would crumble
Is it big John's speciality though? At 54 years of age? It's still a stand up fist fight imo. I'm sorry but I'm going with one of the most explosive, devastating punchers in history, who I've seen plenty of over some boxers dad of who we only have fairy tales and zero footage.
I think iron Mike Tyson Is a different proposition than that poor fella in the auctions with his 13 year old son who didnt want to fight.
Big John is making too many excuses - £250k, no Queensbury rules etc. He accepted the challenge and should get in the ring. Big John will lose more credibility by not fighting than getting iced in the ring. Beginning to smell a strong shyte
That works both ways genius. Tyson bit off ears and tried to break arms IN the ring. I don’t see him fighting to the Marquess of Queensberry on the cobbles
