Lomachenko got beaten by Salido and was dropped by a faded Linares. Tank Davis by KO!.

I don't recall Mayweather nor Ward lose a to a guy with 12 losses of his record but nice try.

 

Ya they never fought for a major title in their 2nd pro fights. You are missing the point - most great fighters have been dropped and put on ***** street by far inferior opposition and had close calls against them. Loma gets dropped once by a world class fighter but was only a flash kd and wasn't even buzzed, much less hurt than guys breakdancing in the ring, and all of a sudden he can't take a punch amd would get shredded by everyone. Only idiots think that way.

 

I had Loma losing 8 rounds to 4 against Salido just like one of the judges who scored the fight. Hate to break it to ya, but the fight wasn't close. Salido was awarded the victory. Loma couldnt deal with Salido pressure and waited too often at times to fight back. Now those are facts, numbnuts.

 

Are you serious? It was his 2nd pro fight you idiot against a steroid abusing, low blow fouling, weight limit ignoring clown! I had him losing too. What more is someone to overcome in their 2nd pro fight!?!? You're an idiot. Who did FMJ fight in his 2nd fight? Ward? Anyone else for that matter? I'm good with you, you're a tool that has never boxed in his life and knows Jack **** about the sport. You're on ignore.

 

By age 26 Floyd Mayweather had won 14 world title fights, he was a 2 time world champion, and 2 division world champion.
By age 26 Vasily Lomachenko was losing to a past prime Orlando Salido who had losses in the double digits.

By age 32 Mayweather had over 20 world title fights, was a five division champion, seven time world champion.
By age 32 Lomachenko had 13 title fights won and was a three division champion.

Mayweather > Lomachenko

 

The irony in this statement is off the charts. You are likely the biggest nuthugger on here. You make the Pacquiao nuthuggers from years back on here look sane.

 

Haha.. sure budd.

Calling me a nuthugger is your only way of coping with the facts I present to you and my haters.

If admitting that caneloggg 1 and 2 were close fights makes me a nuthugger, then I guess I am.

But if that makes me a nuthugger then what are those who have been crying "robbery" DAILY for almost three years now? lmao!!

 

posters trying to use 'FACT' with a subjective listing like P4P, which EVERYONE does differently, shows an incredible amount of ignorance, as well as a lack of proper education.

 

Don't give me that sorry excuse. Loma was already in his physical prime by the time he went pro. He was 26 years old at the time he fought Salido. Team Loma hand picked the weakest champion in the division and he still couldn't pull it off the win. Mayweather/Ward at 26 years of age were beating established champions in their respective divisions.

Isal bodied you, I just laid the chalk down.

 

You're the only sorry excuse. It doesn't matter how old he was, it was a world title fight in his 2nd pro fight against a known steroid abuser who blew off the weight limit and was allowed to get away with murder and low blows all night. Those are facts. Here are some other interesting facts:

People who are racist against white people HATE Lomachenko more than anyone because they feel threatened by him and their own bigoted champion of the same color as them would get the brakes beat off him by Loma

Ditto goes for FMJ and black people

Ditto goes for Mikey Garcia and Mexicans - everybody ****ing hates Canelo that's a given

And I don't ever recall someone racist against Asians but I guess ditto Pacman???

Those are facts you inbred cuck clown.

 

I've been accused of having an axe to grind with Loma before now (I don't, it's more a case of people who are big on him taking impartial critical comment as a slight against him), so I'm definitely no Lomachenko nuthugger;

I feel that Russell lost that fight really clearly, a 117-111 to 116-112 type of deal. 8-4 is a margin one might typically refer to as 'close but clear', but it's more of a 'clear and not-so close' in this case, as a guy could quite fairly have it a round wider than that.

Just my 2¢ on that particular point.

 

You can have a 12-0 fight with each around being close. Making the fight close.

I'm not paying that was the casé with Loma-Russell, because it definitely was not a 12-0 fight, bit whether you had it 8-4 or 9-3 a lot of the rounds were close.

 

It's a good win. Alexander isn't so pleasing to watch, and he didn't ultimately meet the early expectations of the boxing media, but he hung with some good guys and some bangers at the age of 22, 23, 24 before he went downhill. He beat Chino Maidana more clearly than anyone has beaten him. It's hard to defend a claim that he sucks.

In any case, I don't recall anyone who really follows the sport that closely touting Alexander as a great win for Tim (maybe the HBO pundits, who had a reason to big the contest up). Devon had already gotten a gift against Kotelnik. It was merely a solid unification scalp for Bradley.

 

I'd call it competitive, but with a very discernible overall edge in control for one guy. There were spells where Loma really did as he pleased.

 

Tank was almost stopped himself by Pedraza, people seem to forget that because of the finish.

The guy has fought no one, and seems to be another Broner in the making.